Offshore Banking - Offshore Services - Panama - Dominican Republic
Retirement Abroad - Residency - Second Passport

.
news headlines - news archives
.

Contact Us About Offshore Banking, Residency and Second Citizenship, Company Formation and Retirement Abroad Options . .

.
Use Our
Reply Form
.
Click Here
Return to The Main Directory Section:
.
Click Here

.


About The Author:
John Schroder of Ascot Advisory Services writes articles for a number of publications and e-zines regarding topics and issues of interest or concern to clients.  As an expatriate himself, John has lived abroad for many years, and assists clients with services related to the topics on this web site.
.
.

.h
Sign Up for The Monthly Newsletter:
News items, articles plus the popular Readers Write In Section
Our on-line newsletter bulletin now going on our eighth year!   Offering  our  clients and readers news items and headlines often not covered by the mainstream media, articles of interest regarding banking, economics, real estate, taxes, living or investing abroad, plus much more.  Finally, our very popular readers write in section, with answers to some of the questions many of our readers have - that no one else wants to answer truthfully, except us!
Want to See our Other Back Issues from 2002 - 2006?........Click Here
news

Visit The Main Newsletter Section & Read Past Issues On-Line:
Dominican Republic Real Estate, Residency Filing, Banking and Interest Rates.  Panama Residency and Retirement.  Naturalization and Dual Citizenship - Expatriate Issues.  Economics commentary, inflation, housing, stock markets and investing - Plus a Whole Lot More ! .
Our December 31, 2008 Newsletter Edition
.
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC REAL ESTATE:
.
Many of our clients have been asking about the real estate situation in the Dominican Republic, and the following is a short list of properties currently on the market, almost all of which are new construction.
.
In Juan Dolio (directly on the beach) - New Construction consisting of 2 bedroom, 2 bath, 1,000 square foot condominium with swimming pool and jacuzzi facing the beach for residents.  Terrace in each condominium facing the ocean, modular kitchen.  US$180,000
.
In Juan Dolio - New Construction of private villas in closed community, 3 bedrooms, 3 baths, private terrace with jacuzzi, starting at US$175,000.
.
In Arroyo Hondo section of Santo Domingo - One bedroom, one bath condominium apartment with balcony and off street parking for one vehicle.  US$35,000  
.
In Evaristo Morales section of Santo Domingo - New 2 and 3 bedroom condominium apartments with 1150 and 1350 square feet of living space.  Amenties include: two and half bath, balcony, pre-instalation for A/C, imported Spanish tile throughout.  Building comes with elevator and common gas for residents, off the street parking for two vehicles per apartment, emergency generator for building.  Starting at US$147,000. 
.
In La Julia section of Santo Domingo - New 2 and 3 bedroom condominium apartments with ocean view, 1200 and 1400 square feet.  Each with balcony, 2 off the street private parking spaces for each unit.  Starting at US$165,000
.
In Gascue section of Santo Domingo - New Construction, 1200 square foot 2 bedroom condominium apartments and 1500 square foot 3 bedroom condominium apartments.  Amenties include: Ocean View, balconey, 2 offstreet parking spaces per unit, swimming pool, childrens play area, elevator, intercom, common gas, emergency geneator.  Starting at US$145,000
.
.
IN THE NEWS:
.
.
UN SAYS CARIBBEAN ECONOMIC GROWTH TO SLOW TO 1.9% IN 2009 FROM 4.6% IN 2008.  December 30, 2008
.
Economic growth in Latin America and the Caribbean will fall next year to 1.9 percent from its estimated level of 4.6 percent for 2008, the U.N. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean said Thursday.  Almost all the region's countries gave priority to macroeconomic equilibrium and generated budget surpluses, Alicia Barcena, the ECLAC executive secretary, emphasized upon presenting the document.  Barcena said that today the region is better prepared to confront the global economic slowdown, but it is certainly not immune to it.
.
Looking at individual countries, this year it was Uruguay that led the region's growth with a rate of 11.5 percent, followed by Peru at 9.4 percent; Panama, 9.2 percent; Argentina, with growth of 6.8 percent; and Ecuador, 6.5 percent.  Brazil grew this year at 5.9 percent, one tenth of a percent more than Bolivia, whereas Paraguay grew at 5.0 percent; Venezuela, 4.8 percent; the Dominican Republic, 4.5 percent; Cuba, 4.3 percent; Chile, 3.8 percent; and Honduras, 3.8 percent.
.
http://www.laht.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  If you recall, we have talked about this before.  With the US looking at a contraction of minus 6 percent in 2009, a positive GDP growth of 2 percent in Latin America does not look that bad.  Again, part of the reason has to do with lending practices of the banks in many of these other countries (zero money down mortgages and so-called Liar loans did not exist), and part has to do with the lack of excessive personal debt encumbering the local populations.  In terms of the Dominican Republic, while it could be the case that activity in the real estate market slows down (we are talking about the true local market, by the way, and not these inflated multi-million dollar properties marketed to foreigners in the tourist areas), we do not see any drops in real estate values.  Why?  Simply because many Dominicans own their own homes for cash (priority number one for a Dominican is to pay off the mortgage, and not use their home as an ATM), and or they have perhaps 40 percent or more invested in their homes as a down payment.  In any event, we can see some similarities in Europe as well (minus the UK of course, which copied the American plan of borrow until bankruptcy), whereby even though a recession is looming, the average citizen is not necessarily drowning in credit card debt or mortgage debt.  As the US and UK now embark upon Zimbabwe like economics, other countries certainly should be arguably better off, based on the fundamentals.
.
.
EXPATRIATES FEEL THE EURO'S PINCH
By Jenn Abelson - December 29, 2008
.
Francesca DeMeo moved to Paris from Massachusetts last year with visions of glamour and adventure. She would travel Europe, entertain friends at her posh apartment, study at the world-renowned Paris Observatory, and indulge her gastronomic fantasies.  But the euro, which turns 10 years old on Jan. 1, has laid waste to DeMeo's dreams as well as those of Americans across the continent. They weren't counting on the demise of the dollar against the euro, which is now worth $1.40. That represents a roughly 50 percent drop in the dollar's value since 2000.  As a result, Americans living in Europe, who were already struggling to make ends meet, are finding it even more difficult as the value of their US savings plummets and Europe grapples with economic turmoil of its own.
.
Students and expatriates have had to adjust their lifestyles; businesses that employ Americans in Europe have been forced to pay more dollars to keep up; and US retailers with European outlets have scaled back operations and sustained losses.  DeMeo, a 24-year-old Fulbright scholar, has moved out of her apartment and into an inexpensive dormitory room half the size. She buys food at cheap outdoor markets instead of chic charcuterie shops. With a limited stipend to live on, she spends her free time tutoring French students in English and baby-sitting for extra pocket money in euros, rather than traveling freely around France, Italy, and Spain.  I avoid at all costs using my dollars from my American bank account, DeMeo said.
.
http://www.boston.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  If they keep running up the national debt and expanding the money supply the way they have been doing, many people will long for the good old days, when the US Dollar was only down or devalued by 50 percent versus the Euro.  Ms. Francesa Demeo, the young lady mentioned in the above article, says that:  I avoid at all costs using my dollars from my American bank account.  A smarter move would have been to convert her dollars to Euros (or something else), before it continues to loose even more of its value.  The latest statistics we have looked at suggest that the US Federal Reserve has been exploding the monetary base at an annual rate of 75%.  They just don't seem to care anymore, as desperation overtakes common sense.  
.
.
DOLLAR'S AUTUMN RALLY PROVES SHORT-LIVED
By Carter Dougherty and David Jolly - December 17, 2008
.
The dollar, which rallied from historic lows in the summer, is firmly back on a downward trajectory as the world digests the implications of a brutal recession in the United States.  While financial markets around the world were convulsing after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on Sept. 15, the dollar rallied as dollar-based investors, including hedge funds, liquidated assets and returned the money to the United States. That forced the dollar sharply up, and seemed to highlight its role as a safe store of value even in times of crisis. But the Federal Reserve's blunt admission this week that it need to virtually eliminate short-term interest rates and resort to unprecedented tactics to hammer down borrowing costs at longer maturities took the shine off the dollar.  There's a reason behind the fact that the Fed had to go this low, said Franz Wenzel, deputy director of investment strategy at AXA Investment Managers in Paris.  The U.S. economy is in deep trouble.
.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/12/17/business/euro.php
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Mr. Anthony Faiola of the Wasington Post reports on December 18, in an article titled, Dollar's Slump Erases Months Of Solid Gains, that: The dollar yesterday staged one of its biggest one-day drops against the euro and fell to a 13-year low against the Japanese yen as near-zero interest rates and the Federal Reserve's plan to print vast sums of cash DILUTE THE VALUE of the greenback.
.
While that policy may ultimately aid an economic recovery, it is robbing the dollar of value as investors anticipate less interest on their dollar-denominated investments and more bills in circulation, making each one worth a bit less. In response, investors are dumping the dollar and buying up other currencies.  If the dollar's fall is unchecked, it could jeopardize the long-term faith of foreign investors in the value of the American currency and could cause foreign investors to dump U.S. stocks and other assets, whose value would be worth less in euros or yen (end of quote).
.
(Editor) The dollar gained in strength versus some other currencies previously, but not because the US economy is on the mend and investors thought greenbacks are the way to go in terms of economic fundamentals.  Rather, some investors, both individual and institutional alike, decided there was no other good options at the moment and dumped all the money into US Dollars, and T-Bills paying zero percent interest.  What will happen if these investors all of a sudden decide that holding US Dollars, or dollar denominated bonds is no longer the best option?  Case in point is the following December 17, 2008 news item from AFP:
.
CHINA SAYS LENDING TO US WILL NOT GO ON FOREVER.  China warned Wednesday it would not keep lending money to the US economy indefinitely, even as new data showed it had consolidated its position as the top buyer of American government bonds.  China's increased purchase of US Treasury securities should not be interpreted as an endorsement of the assumption that the US can borrow its way out of the current financial crisis, the China Daily said in an editorial.  The warning from the state-run newspaper, an English-language daily that mainly addresses a foreign audience, came after the US Treasury Department reported a steep increase in Chinese holding of US Treasury bonds.  The China Daily said that, given the global economic crisis , the consequences would be serious if China and other nations stopped channeling money into the US economy.  Interest rates in the US would rise to undermine that government's efforts to bailout distressed financial institutions and companies, it said (end of quote).
.
In regards to the activities of the US Treasury and Federal Reserve, Mr. J.S. Kim wrote an article dated December 15th which was titled - Is The Great Depression the U.S. Treasury's Playbook for the Current Crisis? Mr. Kim offers the following very poignant commentary:
.
Paulson defended his actions by stating: There is no playbook for responding to turmoil we have never faced. We adjusted our strategy to reflect the facts of a severe market crisis.  In fact, there is such a playbook. Consider the plan of the Federal Reserve in response to the 1929 US stock market crash that ushered in the beginning of the Great Depression.  During the Great Depression, though thousands of small US banks failed, some of the largest banking institutions like JP Morgan thrived. In 1930, the Federal Reserve Board and the 12 Federal Reserve banks advanced some of the largest US banks $13,022,782,000 to re-capitalize their balance sheets and to offset the losses that they suffered through speculation on risky assets (Source: US Congressional archives, US Congressman Louis McFadden). In a scathing speech made on the floor of the US Congress that addressed this behavior, Congressman McFadden stated,  When the swindle began to fall, the bankers knew it in advance and withdrew from the market. They got out with whole skins and left the people of the United States to pay the piper.
.
Because the exact same thing happened during the Great Depression that is happening today, US Treasury Secretary Paulson's actions should not come as a shock to any student of history. In fact, not only are the actions taken by the elite banking cartel during the Great Depression a playbook for what is happening today, it is a virtual blueprint.
.
How can this be? John Maynard Keynes, the father of all modern economic theory that is taught in higher institutions of education like the University of Chicago and Harvard University once stated, There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.  It is fairly safe to say that the same holds true today. Not one in a million men are able to see that the root of all economic problems worldwide today is a fraudulent, unsound monetary system.
.
http://seekingalpha.com/
.
(Editor)  Through all this, it is interesting to note that while no one wants to use the dreaded D-Word, many government policies and activities seem to mimic what when on during the 1930's (direct government re-capitalization of SOME of the banks, such as JP Morgan, for example).  We can only wonder, if the results will be the same as well?  In other words, are some economic commentators correct, when they say that they are only buying some time, and that double digit unemployment levels, increased crime and civil disorders, not to mention a failed currency and bankruptcy are coming no matter what?  We do not know for sure, but in the least, we would rather wait for the movie to come out on DVD, and watch it from someplace else very far, far away.  
.
Another excellent article was written by Mr. Larry Elliott (who is the Guardian Newspaper's Economics Editor), on December 18, 2008 titled: Why Such Drastic Action? The Fed Is Utterly Petrified.  One highlight from the article is the following: 
.
There is a risk that the Fed's manipulation merely substitutes a bubble in the bond market for a bubble in the housing market, and that like all the previous bubbles, this will collapse disastrously. And there's a risk that printing money leads to an inflationary surge in two or three years. The Fed knows all about these risks but thinks they are worth taking: that's a measure of how serious things are.
.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Did someone mention bubble?  Another one? 
.
.
THERE'S NO PAIN-FREE CURE FOR RECESSION
By Peter Schiff - December 27, 2008
.
As recession fears cause the nation to embrace greater state control of the economy and unimaginable federal deficits, one searches in vain for debate worthy of the moment. Where there should be an historic clash of ideas, there is only blind resignation and an amorphous queasiness that we are simply sweeping the slouching beast under the rug.
.
With faith in the free markets now taking a back seat to fear and expediency, nearly the entire political spectrum agrees that the federal government must spend whatever amount is necessary to stabilize the housing market, bail out financial firms, liquefy the credit markets, create jobs and make the recession as shallow and brief as possible. The few who maintain free-market views have been largely marginalized.
.
Taking the theories of economist John Maynard Keynes as gospel, our most highly respected contemporary economists imagine a complex world in which economics at the personal, corporate and municipal levels are governed by laws far different from those in effect at the national level.  Individuals, companies or cities with heavy debt and shrinking revenues instinctively know that they must reduce spending, tighten their belts, pay down debt and live within their means. But it is axiomatic in Keynesianism that national governments can create and sustain economic activity by injecting printed money into the financial system. In their view, absent the stimuli of the New Deal and World War II, the Depression would never have ended.
.
On a gut level, we have a hard time with this concept. There is a vague sense of smoke and mirrors, of something being magically created out of nothing. But economics, we are told, is complicated.  It would be irresponsible in the extreme for an individual to forestall a personal recession by taking out newer, bigger loans when the old loans can't be repaid. However, this is precisely what we are planning on a national level.  I believe these ideas hold sway largely because they promise happy, pain-free solutions. They are the economic equivalent of miracle weight-loss programs that require no dieting or exercise. The theories permit economists to claim mystic wisdom, governments to pretend that they have the power to dispel hardship with the whir of a printing press, and voters to believe that they can have recovery without sacrifice.
.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123033898448336541.html
.
EDITORS NOTES:  We agree with Mr. Schiff whole-heartedly, and why all they are doing at the moment will possibly only prolong the problem, and in fact, make it worse.  An excessive debt problem cannot be solved by creating even more debt, just as offering a pyromaniac matches and a can of gasoline will not a fire marshal make.
.
.
NEW ECONOMIC POLICY: IF YOU HAVEN'T GOT ENOUGH OF THIS STUFF, JUST PRINT SOME MORE.  By Bill Jamieson - December 18, 2008
.
The new big thing to save the world economy is quantitative easing. Not an up-market euphemism for a massage, but the latest and most desperate measure yet by central banks to stop a severe recession turning into depression. And it may soon be adopted in the UK.  Quantitative easing is the elegant, sanitized term for the process by which a central bank fends off the threat of deflation by effectively printing new money, or increasing its supply.  A simple model would work like this: the government issues bonds and sells them, directly or otherwise, to the central bank. The bank creates new money for this purpose and pays the government for those bonds. The money is then used by the government to stimulate the economy through public works and infrastructure projects.  Magic new money: have we really walked into this Last Chance Saloon? Yes, we have.
.
http://news.scotsman.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Ah, history repeats itself yet again.  Not to be outdone by the Colonials, the British are possibly now jumping onto the same runaway train (maybe putting more of your investment funds into Pound Sterling is not such a great idea, as simply one interpretation of all this).  Interestingly enough, the Pound is just about at par with the Euro right now, in terms of exchange rates, and we might suggest, the inflation party has not even gotten started yet. 
.
.
JAPAN SHOULD SCRAP U.S. DEBT; DOLLAR MAY PLUMMET
By Stanley White and Shigeki Nozawa - December 24, 2008
.
Japan should write-off its holdings of Treasuries because the U.S. government will struggle to finance increasing debt levels needed to dig the economy out of recession, said Akio Mikuni, president of credit ratings agency Mikuni & Co.  The dollar may lose as much as 40 percent of its value to 50 yen or 60 yen from the current spot rate of 90.40 today in Tokyo unless Japan takes drastic measures to help bail out the U.S. economy, Mikuni said. Treasury yields, which are near record lows, may fall further without debt relief, making it difficult for the U.S. to borrow elsewhere, Mikuni said.  It's difficult for the U.S. to borrow its way out of this problem, Mikuni, 69, said in an interview with Bloomberg Television broadcast today.  Japan can help by extending debt cancellations.
.
http://www.bloomberg.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Did this Japanese CEO of a credit rating agency say what I think he said?  Is he really suggesting that Japan forgive or otherwise cancel all of its US Treasury debt?  These are the kinds of things so-called wealthy industrialized nations do regarding the outstanding debts and loans of poor, third world, banana republic, developing countries.  Along these lines, it is interesting to note that the International Monetary Fund claims that: countries with more than 60% of their public debt held by nonresident foreigners run a high risk of currency crisis and insolvency, or debt default. Gee, that sounds awfully lot like the situation the US is in at the moment.  Along these lines, Mr. Akio Mikuni referenced in the above article also suggest that the US Dollar will devalue further by 40 percent (how much further down could it go?).  Billy Joel had a song with the lyrics, say goodbye to Hollywood.  Say goodbye to the US Dollar might be a more appropriate current substitute.
.
.
PATERSON'S TAX-HIKE PROPOSAL DRAWS JEERS IN NEW YORK
December 18, 2008
.
A budget plan by Gov. David Paterson that would plug budget shortfalls by slashing spending and raising taxes on items from sugary soft drinks to iTunes downloads is drawing criticism in New York.  In an attempt to close a $15.4 billion budget gap, one of the largest in New York history, Paterson's $121 billion plan includes major reductions in state programs, and a wide range of tax increases for everyday goods and services.  We're going to have to take some extreme measures, Paterson said Wednesday.
.
The proposed budget calls for 137 new or increased taxes, consolidation of more than a half-dozen state agencies and the closing of more than 10 state facilities, including six children, family and youth centers.  The plan also includes reductions in school aid by $698 million, $3.5 billion in health-care cuts and the elimination of 521 state jobs.  New Yorkers would face tax hikes on beer, wine, non-diet soft drinks, and digital services like iTunes downloads. Cab fares would rise 4 percent while the cost of cable and satellite TV services, tickets for sporting events and movies would also jump by the same percentage.  Although spending reductions are clear priorities for Paterson, he has not ruled out income tax increases.  This is where we are, Paterson said.
.
http://edition.cnn.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  And there you have it or this is where we are, the current Governor of New York tells us.  The man that seemingly has taken elocution lessons from Mike Tyson wants to implement 137 new or increased taxes, and he says higher income taxes are on the table too.  Stayed tuned, as we would wager more of this to come from other municipalities and states across the nation, regardless if some of these states end up formally declaring bankruptcy, or not.  Governor Paterson has recently said that his initiatives were shared sacrifice.  Or, we can offer up that other wonderful catch phrase: We are all in this together.  Funny though that some share more of the sacrifice than others, or stated another way, the term WE often means YOU, more specifically.
.
It seems to be the case more often than not, that US Congressmen and other officials, are more concerned about saving or aiding corporate campaign donors, then they are about making policy (and monetary choices) that would probably be best for the overall country (that might be in conflict, or detrimental to some private industry).  Which is to say, there are times when what is good for General Motors is good for the country, but there are also times when what is good for the average citizen and nation as a whole, is not so appealing for GM.  Corporate America cannot have their cake, and eat it too, especially when the average citizen always gets the tailpipe regardless (so to speak).  In other words, low income taxes for corporations when times are good (and much higher income tax rates for individuals) and then tax-payer funded bailouts afterwards, when corporations get themselves into trouble (and due to foolish decisions we might add).
.
Strikingly, as unemployment increases seemingly in lock step with the national debt, members of Congress will give themselves yet another raise in 2009, amounting to a US$4,700 pay increase, translating into new average salaries of US$174,000 with the esteemed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi earning $217,400, all of which places such elected official in the top 6 percent of national income brackets.  At a time when there seems to be no money for initiatives or programs that benefit the average citizen (corporate citizens, such as banks and brokerage firms of course another story), these additional pay increases for 2009 add up to an additional $2.5 million to the federal budget.  A mere drop in the bucket, regarding the overall budget (which is already predicted to exceed US$1 Trillion Dollars in terms of the deficit), but many average people would of course gladly take those drops if offered, we think.
.
When examining appointed officials, such as Robert Rubin and Hank Paulson, is it really true their loyalties to their former employers (and their own stock options) are left on the door mat when they enter government?  Perhaps Mr.  James Howard Kunstler said it best when he wrote in a recent (December 22, 2008) article that:  Public sentiment toward the accelerating economic fiasco has shifted, seemingly overnight, from a mood of nauseated amazement to one of panicked grievance as the United States moves closer to an apparent comprehensive collapse.  What seems to spook people now is the possibility that everybody in charge of everything is a fraud or a crook. Legitimacy has left the system (end of quote).   
.
(Editor) All of us, as individual citizens, really have no control over what any central bank or politician may, or may not, do.  However, knowing what the results will be, of the actions taken (economically and politically), plus understanding the varied lessons of history, at least gives us some guidance.  The result being, to consider getting our money secure, maybe in other countries, maybe in other currencies, and perhaps with some assets in the form of gold or silver as well.  In addition, having other options, such as a second passport and a second home (in another political jurisdiction, meaning another country to be more precise) certainly could not hurt either (even if for nothing more than for banking purposes, having another citizenship never is a bad idea).
.
In any event, raising taxes happens to be one of the dumbest things politicians can do, during a recession or economic downturn, unless they want to guarantee that things get even worse.  While politicians are often brilliant at shooting their mouths off and swaying public opinion, what they know about economics would not fill a teacup, or do they in fact know exactly what they are doing, and do not care?  They do of course know how to give themselves pay increases, regardless of performance.  But is that really anything new?   
.
.
EXPAT WORKERS LEAVE US TO HUNT FOR JOBS
By Daniel Pimlott  -  December 11, 2008
.
As a business graduate from a very good university in the US, Pratik Shah had every reason to expect an easy passage into a well-paid corporate career.  But, even after applying for nearly 1,000 jobs, he will not move directly from his masters in engineering and management degree at Duke University to a position at a top financial company. Instead, he will head back to his home town of Aurangabad, near Mumbai, to search for work there.
.
The realities of the financial crisis and recession are creating a very different environment for jobseekers from Asia in the US.  I have decided to move back to India, says Mr Shah, The primary reason is that I didn't find a job here.  Meanwhile, his classmates are finding the going equally tough. Whereas, of the 150 students graduating in 2007 about 80 or 90 found jobs, this year only three have done so thus far. Some of Mr Shah's friends have found work, only to be laid off.  On the other hand, job opportunities back home in Mumbai, India's business powerhouse, look better, with more opportunities for career advancement and salary growth.
.
http://www.ft.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  According to a recent survey in London, more than 30 percent of expatriate workers in the UK's financial services sector expect to leave the country in 2009.  If true, then it seems like there will be plenty of extra seats in the future when riding the London underground, which could be a good thing, maybe (unless they decide to raise the fares to offset decline in persons using the public transportation).
.
.
SOME MEXICANS LEAVING US, PLANNING NEVER TO RETURN
By Ivan Moreno - December 12, 2008
.
After going months without a full-time job, Daniel Ramirez has decided it's time to return to family in Mexico.  Vicenta Rodriguez Lopez says she can't afford to live in Colorado any more because her husband was deported.  Roberto Espinoza is going back, too. After 18 years as a mechanic for a General Motors dealership in Denver, his work permit wasn't renewed and he didn't want to remain in the country illegally.
.
All are leaving Colorado in time for Christmas, joining a traditional holiday migration that will number almost 1 million people, says Mexico's interior ministry. But they have no intention of returning to Colorado, a place that promised prosperity. You despair. You think,  I used to earn $600 a week and now I'm getting half of that a week? said Ramirez, 38, who lost his Denver construction job in August. He left last week, driving to San Luis Potosi in central Mexico.  Mexico's consul general in Denver, Eduardo Arnal, said more people like Ramirez are going home for good.
.
http://www.denverpost.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Imagine if 10 Million unemployed and broke Mexicans, previously living in the US, all of a sudden decided to flood into Guadalajara.  If they were coming home with pockets full of cash, it might be another story, but coming back because there are no more jobs in the US (with nothing more than lint in their pants pockets) puts a tremendous strain on social services in Mexico, not to mention other social issues as well.  Talk about the ultimate irony.  We wonder if the US Government will take a cue from the Mexican Government, and start printing up pamphlets telling these would be travelers how to make the trip back safely?
.
.
DOWNTURN SPURS SURVIVAL PANIC FOR SOME
By Nicole Maestri - December 16, 2008
.
A paralegal, recently laid off, wanted to get back at the establishment that he felt was to blame for his lost job. So when he craved an expensive new tie, he went out and stole one.  The story, relayed by psychiatrist Timothy Fong at the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute and Hospital, is an example of the rash behaviors exhibited by more Americans as a recession undermines a lifestyle built on spending.  In the coming months, mental health experts expect a rise in theft, depression, drug use, anxiety and even violence as consumers confront a harsh new reality and must live within diminished means.
.
Besides an increase in shoplifting, psychologists said retailers need to be prepared for more instances of violent behavior like that seen at a Wal-Mart store in Long Island, New York the day after Thanksgiving.  I wouldn't be surprised if we see an up-tick in crime, related to stealing, said UCLA's Fong.  I wouldn't be surprised if we see more workplace violence and more violence at the malls.
.
http://www.reuters.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  If shoplifting is the worst of it, consider it a blessing.  Hell hath no fury like an unemployed individual that has been tossed out of his McMansion by the Sheriff's department enforcing a bank eviction order, not to mention that his leased BMW was towed away the day before by the repossession guy.  We would suggest there are whole lot of angry people out there, and many of whom would not be profiled as your so-called typical criminal or anarchist.  Case in point, the gentleman mentioned in the above news article that was working (or no longer working, as the case may be) for a law firm.
.
Of course, we speculated about this possibility some time ago in previous newsletters.  How interesting is it, psychologically speaking, that some people coming from so-called wealthy industrialized nations are fearful about intermingling with what they perceive are poorer (and thus supposedly dangerous) citizens in another country (fearful they might kill you for a camera, or perhaps even less, as the common wisdom might be), while yet at the same time, the first thing a guy from a wealthy country presumably does, once the loss of a job occurs, is to go out and shoplift (using the example mentioned in the article).  Using the law firm employee once again as an example, here is a person that probably already has more material goods and possessions than many people in other countries, and yet his first instinct is to steal because he is supposed perturbed at the establishment (funny, considering how some would define him to be part of the establishment).  Human beings are interesting creatures indeed.  Another related news item regarding this topic is below. 
.
.
CRIME INCREASES IN SOME AREAS AS ECONOMY FAILS
By Kevin Johnson - December 21, 2008
.
Nothing about the failed bank robbery here earlier this month was ordinary.  The suspect, a 51-year-old woman, does not fit the typical criminal profile. The weapon, a crudely assembled fake bomb, a tangle of wires protruding from a handbag, is not often a weapon of choice. And the demand, $50,000, was relatively modest by some criminal standards.  The only thing about it that seemed to make sense to local Police Chief Robert DeMoura was Maria Oliva's explanation when she was caught a short distance from Rollstone Bank & Trust.  Frustrated by her inability to find a job, DeMoura says, Oliva told police she was pushed to the breaking point. The chief is not defending her alleged act, for which she has been charged. Yet it is only the latest in a rising number of offenses in this small northern Massachusetts city that DeMoura links to the failing economy.
.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-12-21-crime-and-economy_N.htm
.
EDITORS NOTES:  As I ponder some of these news items, I am reminded of the movie titled Trading Places, with Eddie Murphy and Dan Ackroyd.  While billed as a comedy, the plot of the film of course was to examine what happens when you take a fairly wealthy and successful white man, make him broke and homeless, and in his place, substitute a poor black street hustler.  As it turns out, the Harvard educated well heeled character from the movie was only one paycheck away from robbing, stealing, etc.  Does art imitate life, or is it the other way around?   
.
.
ARIZONA POLICE SAY THEY ARE PREPARED AS WAR COLLEGE WARNS MILITARY MUST PREP FOR UNREST; IMF WARNS OF ECONOMIC RIOTS
By Mike Sunnucks - December 15, 2008
.
A new report by the U.S. Army War College talks about the possibility of Pentagon resources and troops being used should the economic crisis lead to civil unrest, such as protests against businesses and government or runs on beleaguered banks.  Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security, said the War College report.  The study says economic collapse, terrorism and loss of legal order are among possible domestic shocks that might require military action within the U.S.
.
International Monetary Fund Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn warned Wednesday of economy-related riots and unrest in various global markets if the financial crisis is not addressed and lower-income households are hurt by credit constraints and rising unemployment.
.
Nick Dranias, director of constitutional government at the libertarian Goldwater Institute, said a declaration of marital law would be an extraordinary event and give military control over civilian authorities and institutions. Dranias said the Posse Comitatus Act restricts the U.S. military's role in domestic law enforcement. But he points to a 1994 U.S. Defense Department Directive (DODD 3025) he says allows military commanders to take emergency actions in domestic situations to save lives, prevent suffering or mitigate great property damage.  Dranias said such an emergency declaration could worsen the economic situation and doubts extreme measures will been taken.  I don't  think it's likely. But it's not impossible, he said.  The economy is in recession. Consumer spending is down, foreclosures are up and a host of businesses are laying off workers and struggling with tight credit and the troubled housing and financial markets.
.
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2008/12/15/daily34.html
.
EDITORS NOTES:  We offer a quote from Mr. Lazaros Apekis, president of the Hellenic Federation of University Teachers, when asked to explain why anarchy and rioting has continued unabated in Greece.  He says that the youth demonstrations are a genuine social revolt, and he also offers that the target is a political system that has sold out the public in favor of private interests (end of quote).  Somehow this all sounds strangely familiar (as my mind quickly remembers bank bailouts and the like).  Could this be the new Souvlaki heard round the world (or favorite new fast food for the world's middle class, so to speak)?  We do not know, but it is interesting to note it was the Greeks that invented Democracy, and Jacuzzis too.  When commenting on the continued civil disturbances in Greece recently, Mr. Uri Gordon writes in one of the Israeli newspapers: A new benchmark has been set for what can be expected in Western countries during the coming era of economic depression and environmental decay.
.
.
READERS WRITE IN:
.
Hi, How safe is off shore banking?  How might I best go forward?  Any help would be appreciated.
.
EDITORS REPLY:  When many people think of the term offshore banking, usually the first thing that comes to mind is mega-wealthy individuals who might have accounts in the list of so-called tax haven countries.  The truth of the matter is, any time you are banking outside of your own home jurisdiction, it is a case of such a place being offshore for you personally.  And so, if you are someone banking in Singapore, Thailand, Costa Rica, Peru, or any other country you can think of, generically speaking, that is offshore for yourself.  And so, with that said, your question becomes difficult to answer specifically because it all depends upon where you may wish to maintain your accounts.  Are banking laws and government banking authorities much stricter in some countries versus others?  Yes, depending upon which country.  Is it really true that so-called smaller, less developed nations have laws and regulations that are MORE lax than what is the case in the modern, wealthy industrialized nations?  Not necessarily, and often the opposite is the case.  In fact, most people do not know that there is government banking insurance for bank deposits in the Dominican Republic, and, it is certainly much more solvent and secure than FDIC.  Go figure how a small, so-called third world nation could have perhaps stricter banking regulation and supervision in comparison to a so-called modern, wealthy nation.
.
Along these lines, we can possibly flip the question around and ask:  Is banking really that much safer inside the US or some other supposedly more developed country?  Surely one can argue that banking regulators in the US and the UK have turned a blind eye as various forms of sloppy lending practices and financial chicanery have abounded.  Even now, that a problem obviously has come to light, US banking regulators have allowed US banks to drop reserve requirements to supposedly help the banks balance sheets, and have relaxed even further, other kinds of balance sheet collateral requirements.  With this in mind, we would love to know what they are smoking in Washington, D.C. (it surely is not run of the mill tobacco).
.
In any event, establishing a bank account in other countries can, in some cases, be as simple as depositing US$1,000 or less, in terms of minimum balances.  And in addition, bank account interest in many countries is tax-free for foreigners and locals alike.  Also, many banks might offer the ability to maintain savings accounts in US Dollars, Euros, not to mention other currencies as well.  You might be able to move in and out of one to the other, all in the same bank quite easily.  And aside from all that, remember that local citizens are banking inside their own country (where you might be banking), and do not want to loose their money either.  Which leads us back to the point that banking regulations, government supervision practices, and even banking insurance may very well be even more stringent.
.
Now, with that said, obviously some countries might have currency controls (Venezuela, for example), meaning a sort of financial roach motel, whereby the money checks in, but you cannot get it out so easily (which certainly would deter you from investing or banking there).  Other countries might have certain restrictions for foreigners to open an account, and it may not even be the government, but rather simply internal policies of one particular bank, in terms of refusing to accept an account because the owner is not a local, or holds a certain passport (US passport holders especially, in the case of some tax haven countries).  But, that aside, there are many, many very well run financial institutions in the world, and many them in places you may not even think of.  As an example, we highlighted in a previous newsletter, some information about Lebanon, whereby the Head of the Central Bank there ordered the local banks to stay away from these toxic junk bonds and maintain a liquid reserve requirement of 30 percent.  Lebanon?  Yes, Lebanon.
.
Getting back to the comments we started off with, the old common wisdom was, or is, that banking in another country is only for the mega-wealthy, tax-dodgers or people involved with illicit business activities.  It certainly is logical to assume that perhaps some people involved with such things are banking elsewhere, or maybe in tax havens, but can we assume that this applies to 100 percent of banking customers in such a case?  How many people, as a percentage of any overall given population are involved with illicit or illegal things?  Two percent, five percent, even less?  The propaganda or myth that has been perpetuated is that anyone, in the case of US citizens to be precise, banking in another jurisdiction, and in a tax-haven more so, must be a crook or tax cheat.  But is this really true, or has this idea been promoted for another reason, or another agenda?
.
People do bank and invest outside of their home countries for a variety of reasons, and indeed this should be part of your overall financial plan.  Yes, indeed, some are doing so as a safety net.  Meaning, certainly some people may be fearful of political distresses in their home country, or government confiscation (for whatever reason) or economic crisis.  Other people of course may want to take advantage of banking in difference currencies, or the opportunity to earn higher interest rates, or partake of investments not available at home.  Either way, having the ability to hold other currencies, or easily purchase gold or other kinds of assets, and also having those assets securely away from the fray, certainly provides both peace of mind and advantageous opportunities as well.
.
© Ascot Advisory Services 2008

Go Back To The Main Directory Section :
.