Offshore Banking - Offshore Services - Panama - Dominican Republic - Retirement Abroad - Residency - Second Passport
.
news headlines - news archives
.

Contact Us About Offshore Banking, Residency and Second Citizenship, Company Formation and Retirement Abroad Options . . . . . . .

.
Use Our
Reply Form
.
Click Here
Return to The Main Directory Section:
.
Click Here


About The Author:
John Schroder of Ascot Advisory Services writes articles for a number of publications and e-zines regarding topics and issues of interest or concern to clients.  As an expatriate himself, John has lived abroad for many years, and assists clients with services related to the topics on this web site.
.
.

.h
Sign Up for The Monthly Newsletter:
News items, articles plus the popular Readers Write In Section
Our on-line newsletter bulletin now going on our seventh year!   Offering  our  clients and readers news items and headlines often not covered by the mainstream media, articles of interest regarding banking, economics, real estate, taxes, living or investing abroad, plus much more.  Finally, our very popular readers write in section, with answers to some of the questions many of our readers have - that no one else wants to answer truthfully, except us!
Want to See our Other Back Issues from 2002 - 2006?........Click Here
news

Visit The Main Newsletter Section & Read Past Issues On-Line:
Dominican Republic Real Estate, Residency Filing, Banking and Interest Rates.  Panama Residency and Retirement.  Naturalization and Dual Citizenship - Expatriate Issues.  Economics commentary, inflation, housing, stock markets and investing - Plus a Whole Lot More ! .
Our July 1, 2007 Newsletter Edition
.
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC REAL ESTATE:
.
Quite a number of clients and readers have written in saying, they do not have three million dollars to buy some sand in Punta Cana, BUT they still would like to have a beach property in the Dominican Republic just the same.  Fear not, I think we have found the solution.  Which is to say, I want to introduce you to your own personal version of Donny Trump to help you afford a home in the Punta Cana - Bavaro area, and he will not even charge you to have a drink with him (Donald Trump invited potential investors to have a drink with him at the opening of Trumps Punta Cana project, but of course you had to pay US$100,000 for the privilege).  Ironically, this gentleman who happens to be an expatriate living in the country for about seven years now, can possibly build a new villa for you - for less than that (130K).  In fact, he handles assisting with finding a building lot for you, can handle all the construction if you wish (or supervise construction if you want to use your own contractors), and certainly can possibly build a villa or even an entire apartment building (his specialty) for less than what those high priced homes cost elsewhere.  For more information, please send an email to:  JS@ASCOTADVISORY.COM  with your complete contact details and we can put you in touch.
.
.
IN THE NEWS:
.
.
VIETNAM TO BUILD CAR PLANT IN DOMINICAN REPUBLIC - June 16, 2007
.
The Vietnam Automobile Industry Corporation (Vinamotor) would build a car plant in Dominican Republic at the end of this year, creating jobs for over 1,000 locals, said a source from Santo Domingo.  The plant with an initial investment of US $70 million is designed to manufacture buses, trucks, tractors and motorbikes using the latest technology from the Republic of Korea.  According to the source, Vinamotor is nurturing a hope to export these products to eastern US states which are to benefit from tax preferences provided for in a free trade agreement signed between the US and Dominican Republic.  The Dominican source added, up to now, Vinamotor has had exported 50 buses worth US $2.3 million to Dominican Republic.
.
http://www.nhandan.com.vn/english/business/160607/business_7tin.htm
.
.
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC DIPLOMATS MAKING A MARK IN ASIA
Wednesday, June 13, 2007
.
NEW DELHI, India:  When Columbus set foot on the island of Hispaniola, today split between the nations of Haiti and the Dominican Republic, he thought he had arrived in India. Over half a millennium later, an intrepid team of Dominicans landed in India and have started exploring the Subcontinent, making friends and attracting potential investors to the Dominican Republic. Ambassador Hans Dannenberg Castellanos, the Dominican Republic's envoy to India, said while few Spanish-speaking nations have embassies in New Delhi, there are enormous opportunities in many areas of the burgeoning Indian economy.  He explained that an attraction for Indian and Southeast Asian businesses is our geographic location and DR-CAFTA (the Dominican Republic/ Central American Free Trade Agreement) which allows easy access of DR-produced products into the United States which could attract manufacturing plants for pharmaceuticals and textiles.  Officially accredited to Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam, Dannenberg Castellanos believes there are many opportunities in the powerful economy of Malaysia.  Listing just some of the trade areas, he pointed to rice, agricultural issues, irrigation and tourism for Vietnam. For Thailand, he spoke of trucks, tractors, cars, tuna, and other canned goods. And in Malaysia, the Technological Corridors and Educational Centers were just some of the possibilities.  A pleasant surprise for the dynamic, young Minister Counsellor Gabriella Bonetti was the fact that companies from the DR are looking to invest in India's booming real estate market.  A recent visitor to the embassy, Lelei LeLaulu, President of Counterpart International, which works closely with Dominican organizations, noted -Despite its lack of size, Ambassador Dannenberg Castellanos' team has made a big impression in the Indian capital which hosts representatives of the most important countries and businesses in the region.  What laymen see as an endless round of cocktail parties for diplomats, the receptions are where, unencumbered by the formal embassy surroundings, they get much of their business done. So, to test the effectiveness of the Dominican Republic team what better source than diplomatic photographer Mr Kapoor, whose family has photographed (and heard much of the talk in the process) all the major receptions for a century.  Asked who was currently the most popular and therefore, the most effective ambassador on the frenetic Delhi diplomatic circuit, Kapoor unreservedly replied, Ambassador Dannenberg Castellanos, Dominican Republic.
.
http://www.caribbeannetnews.com/news-2019--18-18--.html
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Let us examine what we have here.  A supposedly third world nation of rice farmers (Vietnamese) investing in and establishing the first foreign automobile factory in the Dominican Republic (using South Korean automobile technology), and we have a country thought to be another third world country full of banana farmers (The Dominican Republic) investing in Real Estate in India, among other things.  In addition,   the first subway - commuter rail system in Santo Domingo is being done by a Brazilian Company.  Apart from that, we told you previously about China launching a space satellite for Nigeria, and Caterpillar opening yet another factory in China in order to keep up with the new demand in Southeast Asia, India, Latin America, etc. (which is the case of Chinese workers making a high end product in a Chinese factory, for sales orders filled in other Third World nations - and the only thing American about it is the name plate on the equipment, nothing more).  Which leads us to ask:  Is it possible that the so-called Third World Developing Nations are becoming integrated, in terms of technology and economics, and thus leaving out the former so-called modern first world economies in the process?  In other words, could it be true that the growth and development is being accomplished away from or without the supposedly wealthy industrialized first world countries?  Indeed, the promoters of globalization have argued that even though the manufacturing jobs have left the high wage, high tax welfare states - that the future growth and need will still be there in terms of other higher level industries or jobs.  However, is this really true?  Is it possible that General Motors, Ford, Pfizer, Merck, Motorola, IBM (and so on) have all become truly irrelevant in terms of so-called American know how and technology?  History has proven time and time again, that where there is no domestic capital investments (new factories being built abroad rather than at home as one example) and the national savings rate of it citizens close to zero, that economic trouble (no growth if not extremely slow growth) is just around the corner.  And touching once again on this theme of recession or depression, whatever you want to call it, the US (and other industrialized nations) seem only to be important as large consumer markets mainly, which is to say the manufacturing and production for export virtually non existent in such countries.  However, on the theme of the US economy being nothing more than one big consumer round-about, the US consumer does make up about 70 percent of domestic US GDP and about 20 percent of the worlds GDP, which means what happens in the US will affect the global economy to some extent, BUT not a much as you might think.  Caterpillar says they expect US sales to FALL by double digits inside the US this year (2007) but that will be compensated for by the higher double digit growth in sales elsewhere.  Meaning, even if the US should fall into an economic funk, the rest of the world (and the so-called Third World especially) looks like they should be in decent shape or at least better shape, regardless (and as we have seen, they are already trading or doing business with each other, perhaps leaving the so-called wealthier industrialized nations out in the cold). 
.
Gail D. Fosler says in an article titled: The U.S. Economy Has Slowed Moderately, but the Current Global Expansion is Broad (Jan. 11, 2007):
.
The global economy is fast approaching the point where EMERGING MARKETS  will represent HALF of GLOBAL gross domestic product and three-quarters of global growth.  In other words, for the first time in modern industrial history, what goes on in emerging markets is MORE important to the direction of global growth than events in the industrial world.
.
http://www.conference-board.org/UTILITIES/pressDetail.cfm?press_ID=3038
.
Perhaps an important trend to watch in terms of where you invest, where you live, etcetera.  However, if that does not get you thinking, the following news articles surely will.       
.
.
THE SPECTER OF CHINESE CURRENCY MANIPULATION
By Robert Flint, Dow Jones Newswires, June 13, 2007
.
Many of the powers of Capitol Hill have entered into an alliance to exorcise this ghost: Republicans and Democrats, Senators and Congressmen, corporate lobbyists and union officials.  So far, the Yuan-busters haven't had much luck in officially pinning the manipulation label on China, much less penalizing the Asian giant for its foreign exchange policies. But legislators are definitely trying to kick things up a notch while the Bush administration still pursues a conciliatory policy regarding currency reform.  The reason for the surge in currency legislation is the frustration over China's massive trade surplus with the U.S. and what many influential voices believe is a deliberately undervalued Chinese currency. The under-valuation, or misalignment, of the Yuan translates into the loss of millions of U.S. manufacturing jobs because of unfair competition, maintain the critics of China's currency policy.  While Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and his predecessors have attempted to engage China in dialogue to speed up currency reform to allow the Yuan to appreciate, China has always answered it will proceed with currency reform at the pace it deems appropriate.  Therein lies the crux of the problem. Legislators, unions and business groups all want more pressure brought to bear on China to force it to move faster. In reality, there's little the U.S. government can do beyond asking nicely. A country's currency regime is a matter of national sovereignty and neither China nor any other country is willing to yield on that point.
.
http://biznes.onet.pl/5,1553130,wiadomosci.html
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Did someone mention the need for an exorcist?  If there is any uncertainty, I think that I can offer some ideas about which evil spirits need to be expelled from Capitol Hill.  
.
.
THE COMING COLLAPSE OF THE US DOLLAR
By M R Venkatesh -  June 11, 2007
.
The skew in the global financial system -- commonly called global imbalance -- seems to be fast spiraling out of control.  For some time now economists have been engaged in the mother of all debates: whether the US dollar would collapse by as much as 40% when compared to other currencies (some are even betting on the US dollar going belly-up) or whether there would be an orderly devaluation -- that is, a gradual revaluation of other currencies vis-à-vis the US dollar.  In effect, the question that is confronting us is not whether but when and by how much.  This global imbalance can be understood in economic terms by simply examining the massive size of America's twin deficits -- trade and budgetary. Put modestly, Americans have been living way beyond their means, consuming much more than what they could possibly afford and, in the process, borrowing far beyond their capacity for too long.  This was facilitated by a policy of maintaining weak currencies across the world, notably in Asia. This policy of maintaining a competitive exchange rate for their currency to boost exports has resulted in a race to the bottom amongst various countries.  Nevertheless, this arrangement suited countries, both Asian (with a huge unemployed population) and American, (as it provided cheap imports for its huge consumption binge).  While the going was good, everyone profited and expected the arrangement to continue indefinitely. Unfortunately, linearity as a concept has limited appeal in real life, much less is global macroeconomics.  No wonder, of late, countries are discovering that this arrangement has its limitations. The current account deficit of the United States translates into current account surplus of exporting countries. To cover this deficit, US borrows: this corresponds to the forex reserves of exporting countries. The crux of the issue is that no other country, barring the US, has such a huge consumption pattern and an ability to absorb this huge export surplus.  In substance, countries are producing their goods, exporting it mostly to the US, and parking the resulting export surpluses with the US to facilitate US to finance its imports!
.
Obviously, what aids and sustains the US dollar is a 'suspended sense of disbelief' amongst countries about the value of US dollar. Yet, common sense tells us that the excess supply will obviously result in a fall in the value of any product. The US dollar is no exception.  Late Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was fully aware of this paradigm. Seeking to exploit the inherent weakness of the US dollar, Saddam wanted to trade his crude in Euros, which would have lead to a lower demand for the US Dollar and thereby triggered a dollar collapse. And those were his 'weapons of mass destruction -- WMD.  And if some analysts are to be believed, Venezuela and Iran too possess the very same WMD. Naturally, it requires some specious arguments and military intervention to protect the US dollar. Never in the history of mankind has a national army protected the national currency so vigorously as the US Army has done is the past decade or so.  What is bizarre to note here is that despite the fact that crude is produced mainly in the Middle East; officially it can be purchased in dollar terms from one of the two oil exchanges situated in New York and London. Obviously, should Iran carry out the threat to commence oil trade in Euros or better still an oil exchange, the US dollar would come under tremendous pressure.  The US dollar is akin to the promissory note of a defunct finance company. It is common knowledge that a currency, when not backed by anything precious is just a piece of paper. When US abandoned the Gold Standard in early 70s, countries habituated by then to the US dollar under the Bretton Woods arrangement continued to accept the US dollar as an international currency without demur as the world was not prepared for any other alternative. Else, the global economy would have collapsed by 1971.  But the diplomatic silence did not solve the problem. It merely postponed it and it has come back to haunt us.  Post gold standard, by a tacit approval of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and strategic maneuvering, the US had ensured that its currency is implicitly backed by crude, instead of gold. This explains the American 'geo-political and strategic interests' in the Middle East.  But over time even this was found to be insufficient and consequently the oil standard of the 70s gave way to an implicit multiple commodity standard of today. Naturally, commodity prices -- including crude prices -- have soared in the past few years. Unfortunately, this arrangement too is failing the US. No wonder, the US dollar increasingly resembles a promissory note of a defunct finance company.  It is no coincidence that global trade in most commodities, including oil, is denominated in US dollars as the respective international exchanges are located in the US. To what extent are the prices of these commodities manipulated to protect the US dollar is anybody's guess.  However, it may not be out of place to mention that a barrel of oil which cost less than $10 to produce is sold approximately at $70 in the international market.  But as commodity prices go up it has lead to inflation across the globe. No wonder, countries are forced to increase their interest rates to fight inflation.  This has triggered an interest rate hike across continents and the US is finding it extremely difficult to sustain its current borrowing program: it hardly has any elbow room to maneuver.  Meanwhile, countries are increasingly realizing that the value of the US dollar that they are holding is fast eroding, whatever be the officially managed exchange rate.  And if fewer people want the US dollar -- as for instance when oil is traded in Euro the demand for the US dollar will fall -- it would trigger an avalanche.  No wonder, the US Fed is unwilling to make public the M3 figures, as it does not want the holding position of the US dollar to be publicized.  Interestingly, in such a doomsday scenario, some economists are still betting on central banks of other countries to defend the US dollar. It would seem that the US has outsourced even this sovereign function to the central banks of other countries. After all, should the US dollar collapse, the biggest losers will not be the US but those who have US dollar-denominated Forex reserves. Naturally, countries holding US dollar reserves are caught on the horns of a serious dilemma -- should they seek to correct the global imbalance, it could result in the imminent collapse of the US dollar, and should they continue to defend the US dollar, they would be a long-term loser as the current arrangement has seeds of self-destruction.
.
While every central banker is conscious of this fact and thereby seeks to postpone the inevitable while nervously looking for his counterpart in any other country to break ranks and thereby trigger the collapse.  Surely, the emperor is without any clothes. There are only two possibilities from here on: Either we are witness a global meltdown of the US dollar, or allow controlled US dollar devaluation (read, revaluation of other currencies). If it is a global meltdown the global economy is doomed, if is an orderly devaluation, it is damned.
.
http://inhome.rediff.com/money/2007/jun/11dollar.htm
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Many of our clients in Costa Rica, Honduras and every other country that does not use the US Dollar has asked why the local currencies in the countries where they are living are strengthening (worth more than) the US dollar or holding steady ground in terms of exchange rates?  I will give you a hint, it is NOT because the currencies of these countries have been going up necessarily due to some underlying economics per say in these nations (that  would on their own explain this scenario).  In other words, the US Dollar seems to be heading for the basement (or the underground septic tank for those of you who do not have a basement).  However, the question is, will the answer be to switch from one fiat currency to another as the all encompassing solution?  The answer is NO, or at least not exactly for all of your assets.  There are two things I can think of that almost always act as a hedge, one is real estate and the other is commodities (gold in particular).  In terms of real estate, it could very well be the case that buying real estate now (in another country utilizing another currency) may turn out to be one of the best decisions you make, in terms of the current USD exchange rates today AND in terms of what they MIGHT be two to five years down the road.  At the moment, Dominican Republic real estate still is priced at about 30 percent less that the rest of the Caribbean, and probably why you are starting to see the so-called smart money filter in, with regards to luxury real estate purchases.  Donald Trump may come off as arrogant at times, but the man is not stupid, at least not when it comes to business deals (and you should take note that many of his newer investments or real estate projects are outside of the US right now).
.
The other idea of course is to diversify out of the US Dollar for whatever funds you wish to have liquid, but again, the question is how?  Surely your local bank down the street in the US does NOT offer you the ability to open a savings account in another currency.  However, this is why banking abroad (in Europe, Hong Kong, even in places like the Dominican Republic, Uruguay, etc.) becomes an important idea and also why, especially if you are an American, getting another passport and another citizenship so vitally important as well (many banks abroad will not allow US citizens to open accounts, no matter how many times you ask).  Of course, the reason for this is not because they dislike Americans, but rather to avoid any hassles and pressures from the US taxation authorities (as anyone else going broke, they chase money and markers anywhere and everywhere, or at least they try to in any event).  However, it could also be the case that as more and more individual citizens attempt to save themselves and get their money out, calls for currency controls by politicians (stopping you from moving your own money abroad) and or issues surrounding taxation matters, are brought to the forefront.
.
Even FORBES Magazine, now in June 2007, is talking about other currencies and real estate as a hedge (see link below).  When a magazine like Forbes, the icon of American Capitalism, starts to advise other foreign currencies over the US Dollar, you know that something is up:
.
http://www.forbes.com/personalfinance/investoreducation/2007/06/06/
.
.
WHY THE US DOLLAR WILL COLLAPSE
By Greg Peel, FN Arena News - June 12, 2007
.
Economists of the ilk of Nouriel Roubini and Morgan Stanley's Stephen Roach have been pushing the line for at least a couple of years now that the US current account deficit, which has been creeping up consistently in the twenty-first century, is unsustainable. The world cannot continue to finance the US insatiable appetite for consumer exports, and eventually something has to give. What is likely to give is the value of the US dollar.  The US dollar is akin to the promissory note of a defunct finance company, says M.R. Venkatesh, a charted accountant from Chennai, India.  Is M.R. an authority on such matters? Not, indeed, a globally recognised one, but M.R. does have the capacity to encapsulate the problem in pretty simple terms - an achievement that often eludes macroeconomists. And it is simply the factual evidence that is damning.  Put modestly, Americans have been living way beyond their means, consuming much more than what they could possibly afford and, in the process, borrowing far beyond their capacity for too long.  The reason the US has found itself in this position is, to a great extent, a result of the rise of China and other Asian emerging economies and their decision to keep their exchange rates pegged at low levels against the US dollar as a result of the region-wide currency collapse that occurred in 1997. However it must be remembered that China still represents only the third largest surplus on the other side of the US current account ledger. Germany is number one and Japan number two.  When the Chinese economy began to accelerate the balance of currencies actually suited both parties. China was able to fuel a manufacturing surge that employed vast numbers of its peasant population, and the US was keen to voraciously consume whatever cheap exports came its way. But like any drug, it is often foolish to think that a little bit will do and the habit will never get worse. The trade imbalance with China has become much worse.  If you buy a car from a dealer financed by the a loan from that same dealer - a transaction that occurs every day of the week in Australia - the amount you owe is fixed and as long as you can make the interest payments everything is sweet. What is unlikely to happen is that you would buy another car the next, year, and then another, without having disposed of or paid off the first. This would probably lead you into bankruptcy eventually were the car dealer not diligent with its credit assessment.  The US is buying affordable export goods from China on credit. China lends the US the money to do so by buying US Treasuries. The money it lends represents the receipts from the sale of the goods. This seems like a fair arrangement, except that the amount of goods bought on credit never falls - it just rises year on year. And China is not the only country exporting goods to the US. The spark for the whole transaction lies in undervalued foreign currencies - those which make the exports appear cheap in the first place. And the US is hooked on a consumption drug.
.
In mid May the US national debt stood at about US$8.85 trillion, or US$28,000 for every man, woman and child. The current account deficit - that which is financed by foreign rather than domestic reserves - stood at $850 billion or 7% of GDP at the end of 2006.  The US is, on the other hand, having trouble with its own export economy. Traditional leviathans like General Motors are struggling to stay afloat in the face of global competition from countries with much cheaper labor. In order for the US dollar not to collapse as the country continues to move to what appears, from a corporate point of view, to be ultimate bankruptcy, the Fed has continued to raise interest rates.  The US has been bankrupt once before - in 1971. It had reached bankruptcy by financing the long and painful Vietnam War (any analogies here?). But in order to avoid the collapse of the global economy at this point the world capitulated to the US decision to abandon the gold standard. The US dollar has not been backed by gold since 1971. It is simply a promissory note from the US government. All other currencies are measured against this global reserve currency.  As inflation begins to creep back into the global equation - rather ironically as a result of rising commodity prices driven by China's all-consuming need for resources to make the products that it then exports to the world - the Fed is again looking at raising rates. The decision to do becomes far more onerous the larger the actual amount of debt involved. Were the US to cut rates to stimulate the economy and attempt to trade its way out of insolvency this would mean risking no longer attracting the lenders - foreign Treasury buyers - in the first place.  On March 28, 2006, the ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK is reported to have issued a memo, advising members to BE READY FOR A COLLAPSE OF THE US DOLLAR. The US dollar has been falling steadily, although a recent pick up in economic data suggests the end is not yet quite nigh. But the reason the Asian Development Bank issued its warning is because the Fed STOPPED PUBLISHING the quantum of M3 - the aggregate of all US dollars circulating in the world.  If your car dealer asked you to outline your existing debts and you refused, would he lend you the money for the car? What have you got to hide? he would ask. The US dollar is merely a promissory note, an IOU. How many of them are out there? We don't know anymore. But we do know that the Treasury's printing presses do not sleep.
.
http://www.fnarena.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  The Treasury's printing presses do not sleep, so the article says.  That used to be the motto for Citibank (that they do not sleep).  I wonder if there is a connection?  In any event, depending upon what statistics you look at, it is estimated that anywhere from 40 percent to 60 percent of all US Dollars in circulation are OUTSIDE of the United States.  If that is true, my mind starts to wander, and I recall the rumors I heard some time ago (and these are just rumors mind you) about the idea to create two currencies with respect to the US Dollar, one form of domestic funny money for the unsuspecting masses still living inside the US (unfit for export or foreign consumption), and another for world trade (which would in theory be the real deal, or the real money, as it were).  I just guess we will have to wait and see.  But, it certainly is interesting to also note that the current account deficit for the US is about 7 percent of GDP, now in 2007.  The IMF and World Bank decrees that some of these so-called Third World nations that have a current account trade deficit exceeding more than 5 percent are HIGH RISK borrowers (and are countries to place on the watch list in terms of credit risk, internal finances, etc.).  So, what does it say when the US starts to look like a high risk Third World nation, at least on paper?  Will the IMF have to step in and save the US?  
.
.
HOW CURRENCY DEVALUATION DESTROYS WEALTH
By Henry C K Liu, Asia Times - June 14, 2007
.
In today's financial world, a liquidity boom produces rising nominal or face value in return on investment (ROI) with an increasingly hollow economy in two ways: (1) by devaluing all currencies against real assets and (2) by keeping down wages and worker benefits around the globe.  Thus while all currencies devalue steadily but not at the same pace, all of them devalue faster against real assets and slower against labor cost, because wage adjustments tend to lag behind both real and nominal inflation rates. This translates directly into low real valuation for labor, structurally constraining growth of demand to fall behind growth of supply. This in turn leads to an overcapacity economy of declining consumer purchasing power.   THE LAWS OF OVERCAPACITY:  The first law of overcapacity is that it is deflationary (falling market prices of assets), which in turn requires falling wages to maintain corporate earnings. The second law of overcapacity is that it discourages new plant expansion, so that existing capital assets appreciate in market value in nominal terms as liquidity increases, causing the stock markets to rise even though their economic value remains stagnant.  But the laws of overcapacity naturally lead to a downward economic spiral that ends in depression. The global regime of declining currency value is one that will lead to a new form of slavery, despite a rise in living standards from higher labor productivity and resource utilization as a result of technological progress.
.
Universal currency devaluation is masked by an exchange-rate regime in which currencies rise and fall unevenly against one another around the benchmark US dollar as the prime reserve currency, while all currencies fall against hard assets in unison but at different rates due to varying local conditions.  A network of interlocking asset bubbles then grows around the world as a result of dollar hegemony and the emergence of deregulated global currency and financial markets, jumping over national borders, fueled by a general devaluation of all currencies while the trading public is distracted to focus on the relative exchange value of one currency against another.  Thus while both the US dollar and the euro steadily fall, Europeans are comforted by seeing their currency rise against the dollar in recent years when in fact the euro has merely been temporarily falling at a slower rate than the dollar. As the dollar, the prime benchmark reserve currency for trade and finance, devalues against assets, the exchange-rate regime in the current international finance architecture will eventually drag all currencies down with the dollar, lest the trading partners of the United States find themselves saddled with trade penalties associated with inoperative exchange rates.
.
A CONFUSED PUBLIC:  The general public is further confused by uncertainty about whether a rising currency is good or bad for them. They are told to rejoice when their currency falls, as the goods they produce will sell in larger quantity because they can be bought with less money by foreigners, even their own income per unit of production will fall and they themselves will be crowded out of restaurants and shops in their own home towns by suddenly richer foreign tourists.  Ironically, while any normal citizen should find the prospect of receiving less money for the same amount of product he or she produces unappetizing, policymakers insist that there is no alternative systemically. In the meantime, the rich get richer from declining wages worldwide.
.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/IF14Dj01.html
.
.
LOSING THE ECONOMY TO MYTHOLOGY
By Paul Craig Roberts, Counter Punch - June 11, 2007
.
Economic discussion in the United States is trapped in ancient ruts. Both right and left are stuck in old habitual ways of thinking. Neither shows inclination or ability to think independently of ideology. For a country beset with economic problems, this is problematic.  The left-wing, which refuses to accept that the Great Depression was caused by the Federal Reserve's mistaken monetary policy and still blames corporate power and greed for the 1930s decade of high unemployment, is disturbed at the loosening of the leash on corporate power. Generally speaking, the left blames President Reagan for boosting corporate power by cutting taxes and for spear-heading union-busting by firing the striking air controllers.  John Kenneth Galbraith was correct that unions provided a countervailing power, one that has been removed. The left-wing is correct that corporations have grown in power and that income inequality has worsened. But the left is wrong in attributing these developments to tax cuts and dismissed air controllers.  The purpose of Reagan's reduction in marginal tax rates was to cure stagflation and worsening trade-offs between inflation and employment that had undermined Jimmy Carter's presidency. Reagan's tax policy brought a record economic expansion that did not require rising rates of inflation to sustain. It is impossible to argue that the decline in inflation and home mortgage rates benefited the rich more than others. The rich have a lot of margin in their budgets. The poor have none.
.
US income inequality was worsened and the unions busted by the collapse of world socialism and the rise of the high speed Internet. These two developments, which were not part of Reagan's economic program, made it possible for corporations to substitute foreign labor for American labor in the production of goods and services for American markets.  Until the collapse of world socialism, corporations did not have access to the large pools of excess labor in China and India. Until the rise of the high speed Internet, corporations could not hire professional services supplied from distant lands. These two developments meant that highly productive and highly paid American labor could be substituted out of production functions and replaced with equally productive but much cheaper foreign labor, because large excess supplies of Asian labor suppressed Asian wages below the productivity of labor.  Industrial unions were busted by the movement of plant, equipment, and technology abroad.  The professional middle class was adversely impacted by the ability of corporations to contract for the delivery via the Internet of professional services from abroad and by the ability to import cheaper foreign workers on H-1B, L-1 and other work visas.  Jobs off-shoring is dismantling the ladders of upward mobility in the US, polarizing the population into rich and poor, and, thereby, worsening the income distribution.  Americans need to understand that it is jobs off-shoring, not lower tax rates, that is worsening the income distribution. Because of the million dollar cap on tax-deductible executive pay, executive incomes depend primarily on performance-related bonuses. The multi-million dollar CEO pay checks are not salaries. They are bonuses for making or exceeding profit expectations by such practices as off shoring jobs and lowering production costs. We have created an incentive system in which a few corporate executives are amazingly well paid for destroying jobs and career opportunities for Americans. The more they can worsen income inequality by off shoring American jobs, the higher they are paid.
.
The remedy to this crazy incentive system is not higher tax rates.  High marginal tax rates curtail real output. The Federal Reserve then tries to force more output by pumping up the money supply to increase demand, and the economic system responds by raising prices instead of output. This is the serious economic problem that Reagan's supply-side economic policy cured. To resurrect this problem on top of our other problems would be anything but helpful. The emotional remedy for obscene pay packages is a surtax on multimillion dollar incomes.  Princeton economist Alan Blinder, a former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, says that the entire range of tradable professional services can be off shored. I agree with him. He estimates the number of these jobs at approximately 50 million.  Should such displacement occur, what occupations would absorb such numbers of economically displaced Americans? As I have documented relentlessly, in the 21st century the US economy, according to the non farm payroll data of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, has been able to create net new jobs ONLY in non tradable domestic services, jobs such as waitresses and bartenders and health and social services. Free trade ideologues claim without evidence that the lost jobs will be replaced by better jobs. They do not explain why any such better jobs, should they materialize, would not themselves be off shored.
.
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Well, we gave you some data and details before and indeed it is true that according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the jobs are there - BUT for waitresses, home health aides, lawn care engineers (also known as gardeners), ambulance drivers and the like (which are jobs often taken by immigrants certainly willing to work for less, placing downward pressure on salaries domestically).  In addition, one can read between the lines when Henry Liu basically is trying to say that the politicians know darn well that the standard of living WILL fall in the US when he says: the policymakers insist that there is no alternative systemically.  Which is to say, the middle class WILL surely get poorer, and that would seem to be the sanctioned game plan, or of course something that is common knowledge among those in positions of authority with access to the real economic information (of course you already know what we have to say about that - Exit Stage Left, and have your boarding pass ready).  Also, recent statistics tell us what is going on.  The June 1, 2007 Bureau of Economic Analysis Personal Income and Outlays Report tell us that BOTH real and disposable income - actually fell. Personal income (DPI) decreased $9.7 billion, or 0.1%, in April, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) increased by $52 billion, or 0.5%.  The bottom line, US income levels are falling YET for the moment American consumers are either spending more (still shopping as usual) or the effects of inflation on gasoline and food prices are taking its toll.  In other words, most people are still living in Fantasy Land, and God help them if they ever wake up to reality.  Here is another wake up call:
.
.
ECONOMIC GROWTH WEAKEST IN MORE THAN 4 YEARS
Thursday, June 28, 2007 - Associated Press
.
WASHINGTON - The economy limped ahead at just a 0.7 percent pace in the first quarter, the slowest in more than four years, as some businesses clamped down on spending given uncertainties about the severity of the housing slump.  The Commerce Department's new reading on gross domestic product for the January-to-March period, released Thursday, was a slight upgrade from the 0.6 percent growth rate estimated a month ago. But it still fell short of economists' forecasts for a 0.8 percent pace and will probably turn out to be the weakest point for the economy this year.  Gross domestic product measures the value of all goods and services produced in the United States. It is considered the best barometer of the country's economic standing. Although businesses turned cautious, consumer spending remained sturdy, preventing the economy from stalling out entirely.  Even though the economy slowed in the first quarter, an inflation gauge picked up speed.  The inflation gauge tied to the GDP report and closely watched by the Federal Reserve showed that core prices -- excluding food and energy -- rose at a rate of 2.4 percent in the first quarter. That was higher that previously estimated and was faster than the 1.8 percent pace in the fourth quarter.  The Fed has said that inflation poses the biggest potential danger to the economy. The new inflation reading was outside the central bank's comfort zone, which ranges from 1 percent to 2 percent, and was an unpleasant surprise for the Fed, said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at Global Insight.
.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/
.
.
OIL HITS $70 A BARREL  -  June 28, 2007 - Associated Press
.
Oil futures briefly hit $70 a barrel in New York trading Thursday for first time since Sept. 1 after a government report showed that gasoline inventories dropped unexpectedly just as the summer driving season is about to hit its peak.
.
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/06/28/ap3866657.html
.
.
COST OF GAS AND FOOD ROSE SHARPLY LAST MONTH
By Jeremy W. Peters - June 16, 2007
.
Americans felt the pinch of higher gas prices and eroding wages last month, even as an important gauge of inflation drifted lower, government figures showed yesterday. Over all, the Consumer Price Index rose 0.7 percent in May, the Labor Department reported. The core rate, which excludes food and energy, was up just 0.1 percent, a welcome development that encourages the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates steady.  The news on the core rate, which has been inching steadily downward, cheered investors, who continued a stock rally that started midweek.  But for consumers, the news was hardly reassuring. Prices for staple household purchases like gasoline and food rose to even higher levels last month, effectively causing most Americans to take a pay cut. After taking inflation into account, the average weekly earnings for workers in non-management jobs, some 80 percent of the work force, fell for the second consecutive month in May.
.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/16/business/16econ.html
.
EDITORS NOTES:  There still are some people doing well or holding ground as it were, economically speaking, but that is not the point or real longer term problem.  Any time in history when there have been wide divergences in income distributions (in other words, rich and poor with almost no middle class) and or the prospects for the middle class start to deteriorate, that is when the trouble begins.  With that, the real question is, are things very different today then the were say 75 years ago (the Great Depression of the 1930s) in terms of government finances, jobs, and so on?  In other words, how much opportunity and wiggle room is there for application of certain economic policies this time around for some sort of economic band-aid?  Many politicians and economists like to say that things are different today.  I would say that is an understatement, and I do not mean in a positive way either.  Remember the quote from one of the above articles:  policymakers insist that there is no alternative systemically.  No alternative - eh?  How about an airplane ticket? 
.
.
RULING OPENS U.S. TO FOREIGN RETALIATION
By Matthew Lee - June 15, 2007
.
Think you have a tax problem? A Supreme Court ruling this week could leave Uncle Sam, and American taxpayers, liable for untold millions on U.S. diplomatic properties abroad.  While New York City celebrates the decision allowing it to sue foreign governments for more than $100 million in back property taxes, the State Department is bracing for retaliation overseas.  The fear is that governments will take similar measures against the United States, which maintains the world's largest diplomatic presence with more than 3,500 buildings. Many of them could be subject to taxation by local authorities and lawsuits to recover money owed.  More broadly, the finding could also jeopardize traditional rights and privileges that date back to ancient Greece and are enshrined in international treaties, notably the Vienna Convention, which grants immunity from most civil and criminal prosecutions to diplomats on foreign soil.  The court's 7-2 ruling chipped away at some of those immunities by finding that New York has jurisdiction to sue the governments of India and Mongolia for nearly $20 million, more than $41 million with interest, in property taxes local authorities say are owed on residences at the countries' U.N. diplomatic missions in Manhattan.  Officials in New York now say they will use the decision to go after other governments they accuse of refusing to pay property taxes.
.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,,-6712732,00.html
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Two things come to my attention.  First off is the question - How Broke is New York City really?  I mean to say, in the last newsletter we gave you a news story about New York City Police starting off with a take home pay of US$1,400 per month, which represents a retreat to what the wages were 20 years ago (New York's finest just about eligible for food stamps and free government cheese today in 2007).  Now they want to change the status quo and start taxing foreign embassies and consulates.  Fair enough, let's get those free loading foreign nations to pay up, but there is a backlash to all this and it will be the US taxpayers footing the bill at the end of the day after all is said and done.  To quote from the article:  A Supreme Court ruling this week could leave Uncle Sam, and American taxpayers, liable for untold millions on U.S. diplomatic properties abroad.  American taxpayers liable for untold millions of dollars?  Sure, why not - - Just increase the taxes once again, Americans don't mind, or do they?
.
.
UTAH SCHOOLS HIRE MEXICAN TEACHERS
Tuesday, June 12, 2007 - FreeMarketNews.com
.
Several Utah school districts have just hired a total of 12 new teachers from Mexico. The State Office of Education has been working on the plan for almost a year. This is part of an agreement Governor Huntsman made with Mexico when he visited there a couple years ago.  School districts say they're happy about it. The teachers will be filling positions that districts can't seem to staff right now. At the same time, the teachers will help a growing population of Hispanic students in the state. School districts are having a harder and harder time finding elementary school teachers, science and math teachers.
.
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=43580
.
EDITORS NOTES:  School districts are having a harder and harder time finding elementary school teachers, science and math teachers, so says the article.  The United States: a country with a population lacking in math skills, engineering and the sciences to such an extent they have to go abroad to look for employees?  Really?  The article also says: School districts say they're happy about it (in regards to having to hire Mexican schools teachers).  Sure they are happy about it - can you imagine why?  HOWEVER, it is also very interesting to note that school teachers in the rest of the country are being laid off left and right.  Sixteen school teachers recently laid off in Hudson County, New Jersey (and make note some were bi-lingual Latinos).  FIFTY teacher layoffs and the closing of an elementary school are being planned in Gloucester, Massachusetts.  In Lorain, Ohio -- More than one third of Lorain City School teachers will have to look for work next fall as the school administration announced 246 teachers out of 700 will be laid off (and speculation is they will need to lay off 120 more).  In Ypsilanti, Michigan budget reductions will eliminate 17 teacher positions and seven and a half support staff positions, and two teachers from Spanish and/or drama will be eliminated from elementary schools.  In Dayton, Ohio - More than 200 teachers and around 85 teacher's aides have lost their jobs with the Dayton Public Schools.  In Scranton, Pennsylvania teacher layoffs stand at 108, and about 60 school support staff, including janitors, clerks and aides, also lost their jobs due to the school closings and mergers.  Should I go on?  In Perth Amboy, New Jersey the Perth Amboy school district is cutting more than 40 positions, including five elementary teaching jobs, due to funding restrictions.  In any event, the folks in UTAH claim they cannot find elementary school teachers, science and math teachers (and they need to go to Mexico to hire school teachers).  You explain it to me, because for the life of me, it does not make any sense (actually it does, it is called reversed outsourcing whereby you bring in skilled white color workers from abroad - for half the regular local wages).  Where is that guy that wrote to me awhile ago, arguing about how civil service jobs could NOT be outsourced or affected by globalization initiatives, and how I was foolish to discuss it?  Maybe he was laid off from his government job and lost his internet connection?  Oh well.
.
.
MILWAUKEE POLICEMAN FOUND TO BE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT
By Kari Lydersen - The Washington Post -  June 19, 2007
.
Fellow Milwaukee police officers knew him as Jose Morales.  But after an anonymous phone tip this winter, an investigation revealed that Jose Morales is dead, and the officer known as Jose Morales is his cousin Oscar Ayala-Cornejo, 24. He is an illegal immigrant from Mexico who had assumed Morales' identity as a high-school student in 1999.  In court papers filed Friday, Ayala-Cornejo agreed to plead guilty to a federal felony charge of falsely claiming to be a U.S. citizen. Under the plea agreement, he will face six to 12 months in jail.  The police department suspended Ayala-Cornejo after he was arrested May 30 and has since taken him off the payroll.  Alexander Ayala, 26, Oscar Ayala-Cornejo's brother, is a U.S. citizen who is an officer in the same South Milwaukee district and has been placed on administrative duty.  John Balcerzak, president of the Milwaukee Police Association labor union, said the incident shows the department should beef up its background checks.  This is a wake-up call to our department and departments around the country, he said.  When I was hired 20 years ago, they went to old neighbors and high-school teachers. People are really concerned he was able to do this, and they feel let down by him.  Ayala-Cornejo had documentation of his assumed identity, including a driver's license. He attended one high school using his given name, then switched to another school, enrolled as Morales and graduated in 2001. That yearbook shows his picture with Morales' name.  Ayala-Cornejo joined the police department as an aide in 2001 and became an officer in December 2004. In 2005, he was assigned to District 2, a mostly Latino area on the city's South Side, which is also home to many residents of German and Polish descent.  Latino leaders note that working under someone else's identity is common practice for many of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States.
.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003753360_immigcop19.html
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Many people tell me they are concerned about inefficiency, screw ups and such things when the discussion comes up involving police departments in other countries.  In this case, it is disturbing to learn that a police department in the US does not even know who they have working for them (and carrying a gun I might add), and they probably would not have known unless for an anonymous tip.  In any event, we are just about one year away (2008) from the National ID card mandate in the US, complete with high resolution colon scan (you might want to get that colon cleanse product, you know, so you have a nice looking colon when it comes time to snap the photo) and a radio frequency homing device built right into the card.  And to top it all off, the US police official stopping you, asking for your Papers Please, might be an illegal immigrant working under an assumed identity (if that is not ironic, then I do not know what is).  Never say never, it could happen (I was only kidding about the colon thing, but you never know).
© Ascot Advisory Services 2007

Go Back To The Main Directory Section :
.