Offshore Banking - Offshore Services - Panama - Dominican Republic - Retirement Abroad - Residency - Second Passport
.
news headlines - news archives
.

Contact Us About Offshore Banking, Residency and Second Citizenship, Company Formation and Retirement Abroad Options . . . . . . .

.
Use Our
Reply Form
.
Click Here
Return to The Main Directory Section:
.
Click Here


About The Author:
John Schroder of Ascot Advisory Services writes articles for a number of publications and e-zines regarding topics and issues of interest or concern to clients.  As an expatriate himself, John has lived abroad for many years, and assists clients with services related to the topics on this web site.
.
.

.h
Sign Up for The Monthly Newsletter:
News items, articles plus the popular Readers Write In Section
Our on-line newsletter bulletin now going on our sixth year!   Offering  our  clients and readers news items and headlines often not covered by the mainstream media, articles of interest regarding banking, economics, real estate, taxes, living or investing abroad, plus much more.  Finally, our very popular readers write in section, with answers to some of the questions many of our readers have - that no one else wants to answer truthfully, except us!
Want to See our Other Back Issues from 2002 - 2005?........Click Here
news

Visit The Main Newsletter Section & Read Past Issues On-Line:
Dominican Republic Real Estate, Residency Filing, Banking and Interest Rates.  Panama Residency and Retirement.  Naturalization and Dual Citizenship - Expatriate Issues.  Economics commentary, inflation, housing, stock markets and investing - Plus a Whole Lot More !
.
Our May 1, 2006 Newsletter Edition
.
IN THE NEWS:
.
.
FORCLOSURES CLIMB NATIONALLY
By Tim Barker, Orlando Sentinel, April 28, 2006
.
Home-foreclosure rates soared nationwide in the first quarter as consumers grappled with the rising costs of living.  And while Florida recorded a decline in foreclosures, the state still has one of the 10 highest foreclosure rates in the nation, according to a recent report by RealtyTrac.  The first three months of the year saw a 72 percent increase in nationwide foreclosures, compared with the same period of 2005. That's a rate of one for every 358 U.S. households. In Florida, the rate declined 14 percent -- a rate of one for every 247 households.  Economists said a variety of factors -- including rising gas prices, interest rates, property taxes and insurance rates -- are impacting foreclosures. Many of those expenses will only get higher.  Consumers have a lot of payments they have to make and a significant number of those are rising, said Bob Allsbrook, chief economist for AmSouth Bank.  In the seven counties of Central Florida, foreclosure rates fell 5 percent during the quarter, according to the report. Three counties, however, did show increases: Lake, 16 percent; Polk, 4 percent; and Orange, 2 percent.  Also filtering into the housing picture now is the impact of the creative-financing tools used by many consumers to buy homes during the recent housing boom. It was not uncommon to see homebuyers using interest-only or adjustable-rate hybrid loans that offered lower initial payments.  The problem for those buyers is that higher rates are starting to kick in, raising monthly payments, sometimes by hundreds of dollars. That's putting more pressure on household budgets.  It doesn't take much. One spouse loses a job or is unemployed for even a little while, said Scott Brown, an economist with Raymond James & Associates in St. Petersburg.
.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/business/orl-foreclosures2806apr28,
0,5708732.story?coll=orl-business-headlines

.
.
NEW DATA FROM FORCLOSURE.COM IDENTIFIES FIVE MAJOR REGIONAL SPIKES IN RESIDENTIAL FORCLOSURES - Texas, Ohio, Michigan, Georgia and Indiana led nation in foreclosed homes.  Friday, April 28, 2006
.
BOCA RATON, Fla., April 28 -- Texas, Ohio, Michigan, Georgia and Indiana led the nation last month in foreclosed homes, reflecting a nationwide increase in residential foreclosures currently playing out across the United States, according to new data and analysis from Foreclosure.com, which operates America's largest and most accurate database of foreclosed residential properties.  In addition to having the largest number of foreclosed homes in the nation, these five states also experienced some of the fastest month-over-month growth in foreclosures among all states, Foreclosure.com data revealed.  Texas, which led the nation in foreclosed homes, experienced a 38 percent increase in its total number of residential foreclosures during March. The total number of foreclosed homes in Ohio, Michigan, Georgia and Indiana also increased in each state by about one third -- an average of 33 percent -- last month.  Markets that benefited disproportionately from the housing boom over the last five years are most susceptible to foreclosures. However, as our March data indicates, even areas where home prices didn't appreciate as quickly are now seeing increased foreclosures, said Brad Geisen, president and CEO, Foreclosure.com.
.
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060428/nyf136.html?.v=2
.
EDITORS NOTES:  I hate to say I told you so, but we DID comment on this coming to pass in previous newsletters, so no surprise to our readers.  The articles say home foreclosures are up SEVENTY-TWO percent over last year.  An incredible statistic while government bureaucrats sing the political equivalent of: Don't Worry - Be Happy (and of course it was Alan Greenspam who told you it was a good idea to get an adjustable rate mortgage right before he retired as Fed Chairman - remember?).  Anyway, as a side note, I cannot help but laugh at the new Century 21 Real Estate commercial on US television lately.  It portrays a real estate agent going to the airport to meet a seemingly average middle class couple from China that are buying a home in America (and he is practicing how to say welcome to America in Chinese).  Kind of amusing stuff - a US real estate agent offering meet and greet services to people from a so-called third world communist country while US banks are foreclosing on homes owned by native US citizens left and right.  How things have changed indeed.
.
Also, my thoughts drift back to what I told you previously about consumer behavior in many countries thought to be backwater, third world banana republics in terms of real estate purchases.  Which is to say, we had spoken previously of the fact that a large number of working class - middle class people in such countries buy their own home for cash.  How do they do it?  Well, first they purchase a building lot (either in a new residential development or otherwise) and make the payments in order to pay it off over 3, 5, or 7 years.  Then, they take whatever cash they have and start building, often enough starting and stopping again many times all depending on their cash flow situation (which is why you often see many unfinished residential homes in the Dominican Republic, and this is the reason).  Anyway, so it takes them 5 years, 8 years, whatever the time to finish up.  The end result is a fully paid for home with NO bank loan or mortgage.  Delayed gratification has its own rewards, unlike the no money down - got to have it now - consumer credit economy of North America.  Think about this as we watch economic issues going forward.  Which country will do well over the longer term, or better said - which country will have a group of citizens (consumers) who will be better off over the longer term?  The country whose economy is based on nothing but easy credit (whereby citizens basically have ZERO equity, own nothing, and are living off borrowed money) OR the country whereby most people have little debt and pay cash for everything?  I honestly do not think you need a doctorate degree in economics from Harvard University to figure that one out.  Again, why are US corporations so hot and heavy to support NAFTA, CAFTA (and the other AFTAS)?  They want to get into these third world countries in the worst way and without import tariffs or customs duties on the their products (as the result of the trade agreement), because you know what?  That is where the money is, and will be going forward.  Those so-called poor third world banana farmers are the guys with the cash.  Or did they forget to mention that to you on the sophisticated television business program you watch every day?  Remember:  A poor man with US$1,000 in cash is truly worth more than a paper millionaire that has NO equity.  Case in point - American Real Estate Brokerage Company Century 21 catering to a middle class couple from CHINA looking to buy property in the US (and I would wager to bet for CASH).
.
.
WHY PAY TAXES?  Posted April 13, 2006 by Geov Parrish
.
Each year about this time, as many of us supplement our paycheck-to-paycheck giving unto Caesar, I raise this question. This year, let's start with the following observation from a reader, sent in the wake of the reauthorization of the Patriot Act. He notes that terrorism is defined, in Webster's, as the systematic use of terror, esp. as a means of coercion, and provides a long list of examples, past and present, where the US government has done exactly that. He then notes that under the current Patriot Act, it is now illegal to provide money to organizations that practice terrorism, and therefore concludes that as a matter of national security he must refuse to pay his federal taxes.
.
Now, it's unlikely that any IRS or federal court will agree with that novel conclusion, but our reader has a point. Why do we continue to willingly pay for programs and policies that put ourselves, and our country (not to mention countless people in other lands) in greater danger? The bloodshed and corporate welfare in our name and with our money--and our kids' money, and their kids', and their kids'--raises an obvious but seldom-asked question: why do so many of us pay our income taxes?  It's not a rhetorical question, with the obvious answer:  Because they make us.  At the local, state, and especially federal level, we now have a political system where low, middle, and even upper middle income people get far less back in services and benefits from the federal government than we pay in.
.
http://www.eatthestate.org/10-16/WhyPayTaxes.htm
.
EDITORS NOTES:  In honor of April 15 (tax filing day in the US), we thought this to be an article of interest.  Also, I think it appropriate to quote a very popular and common proverb from Sweden (some of the highest taxed people on the planet) - Born Free, Taxed To Death. 
.
.
IRS TO SEEK DATA FROM PAY-PAL: Associated Press, April 11 -2006
.
WASHINGTON -- The Internal Revenue Service won approval from a federal court to ask Pay Pal to turn over information about people who might be evading taxes by hiding income in other countries, officials said today.  A federal court in San Jose, Calif., gave the IRS permission to ask Pay Pal -- a company that enables online money transfers -- for account information for American taxpayers who have bank accounts, credit cards or debit cards issued by financial institutions in more than 30 countries reputed to be tax havens.  Pay Pal spokeswoman Amanda Pires said the company just received the summons.  We're still evaluating our options, she said.  The privacy of our customers' information is something we take really seriously.  Pay Pal enables individuals and businesses around the globe to send and receive money online. In 2005, users moved $27.5 billion through the money transmitter. The company, owned by E-Bay, has 100 million account holders globally.  The request for information is an outgrowth of an IRS effort, begun several years ago, to trace money that American taxpayers hold offshore to avoid paying taxes. The IRS said many of those taxpayers access their money through credit and debit cards. The tax collectors have already obtained information from some credit card companies, merchants and payment processors.   Pay Pal is another one of the mechanisms by which money stashed overseas might be spent- Eileen OConnor, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department Tax Division, told reporters.  In some cases, the IRS obtained credit card numbers but could not identify the cardholder. The IRS said Pay Pal might be able to lead the tax agency to those individuals.
.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/biz/3787001.html
.
EDITORS NOTES:  The last sentences of the article are what we have been saying for some time: the IRS obtained credit card numbers but could not identify the cardholder.  No kidding?  This has nothing to do with any sort of secret plot by tax anarchists or tax havens themselves, but rather simply a fact of life as to how credit card processing is transacted and the business relationship between banks that sign up to become affiliated with the credit card companies.  Note the last line: The IRS said Pay Pal MIGHT be able to lead the tax agency to those individuals.  Perhaps, and then again, a blind man MIGHT find a two-inch wood screw located some where on his basement floor by feeling around for it in the dark for a few weeks. Can you say Fishing Expedition?
.
I find it interesting that this topic of American Taxpayers who have funds offshore to come up once again.  Are there really that many Americans with funds offshore?  If so, then why is this the case?  Also, the IRS has a list of 30 nations that are supposedly tax havens.  Have they included the United States on that list too?  The US is one of the largest tax havens in the world, for EVERYONE else that is not a US citizen that is.  Talk about the pot calling the kettle (you know the rest).
.
.
LAWMAKERS NEVER FACED WITH LOSING BENEFITS
By Jim Abrams, Associated Press Writer, April 19 - 2006
.
WASHINGTON -- Members of Congress occasionally lose elections, but they never lose retirement and health benefits that most Americans can only envy.  A lawmaker who retires at 60 after just 12 years in office can count on receiving an immediate pension of $25,000 a year and lifetime benefits that could total more than $800,000.  That doesn't include 401(k) benefits. And any member who lasts five years in office also can get taxpayer-subsidized health care until he or she reaches Medicare age.  It doesn't matter what a lawmaker does before or after leaving office. Former Rep. Randy Duke Cunningham, R-Calif., who was sentenced to eight years and four months in jail after pleading guilty to bribery charges this year, is still entitled to an annual pension of about $36,000 for his 15 years in the House. That doesn't include his military pension or 401(k) benefits.  Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, who is resigning after 22 years, will qualify for an initial pension of $56,000. DeLay could get pension payments of nearly $2 million over his expected lifetime, according to the National Taxpayers Union, which tracks congressional pension issues.  Lawmakers also have the peace of mind of knowing their federally backed plan will be there when they retire.
.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/politics/3805966.html
.
EDITORS NOTES:  As Moise from Panama used to say - such a deal.  I wonder how many of you, after being convicted of a crime, like say for example, stealing from the company you work for, would still get the company pension?  They say crime does not pay, but that does not seem to apply to politicians.  Maybe that is why so many Americans have money offshore, and why the IRS is hot on the trail?  All that money to pay the politicians for their retirement benefits has to come from some place.  Too bad they are talking about cutting the Social Security benefits for everyone else (one idea presented to solve the social security solvency problem is to cut benefits going forward for all the poor tax-payers who actually pay the taxes in the first place).  
.
.
SLOUCHING TOWARD FRANCE - By Michael Barone, 4/17/06
.
This much is certain: the welfare state, as we know it cannot survive.  So Charles Murray writes in the Wall Street Journal in an article on his new book, In Our Hands.  No serious student of entitlements thinks that we can let federal spending on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid rise from its current 9 percent of gross domestic product to the 28 percent of GDP that it will consume in 2050 if past growth rates continue.  You can quibble about the numbers, but the overall trend is clear: We're on a collision course.  But at the moment we don't have anyone working to stop it--not the Republicans, not the Democrats.
.
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060417/17barone.htm
.
EDITORS NOTES:  We can no longer afford the grandiose welfare state?  Say it isn't so.  Don't worry, we have helicopter Ben at the helm who has said before the answer is to simply print more money if we need it.  Too bad the result will be higher cost of living via inflation (which results in lower standard of living) and devaluation of the currency.  Oh well, they must know what they are doing.  
.
.
NORTHWEST MISSOURI TEENS CHARGED WITH THREATENING SCHOOL SHOOTINGS - April 17, 2006
.
PLATTE CITY, Mo. Two northwest Missouri teens are in custody and charged with threatening a Columbine-style attack at their high school.  Trevor Fattig and Sean Amos attend Platte County R-3 High School. County prosecutor Eric Zahnd charged the two 17-year-olds with felony counts of making a terroristic threat.  Zahnd says Fattig and Amos told classmates they planned to bring explosives and firearms to school on Thursday.
.
http://www.wlns.com/Global/story.asp?S=4781647&nav=0RbQ
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Are things getting better, or are they getting worse?  Want to know why so many young middle class Americans are moving their families to other countries?  Is it not obvious?  A very interesting read is the letter sent in below, in our readers write in section, regarding the relocation experience of an American Expatriate in Colombia and his sons experience in the local school system there.  By the way, recent statistics claim illegal immigration and illegal drug trafficking is up 40 percent in the US (as of April 2006).  There are so many illegal drugs now in the US that that street price of these drugs has gone down (supply and demand).  You see, even drug dealers benefit from globalization and free trade.  However, aside from this, the price of oil is up, the price of gold is up, inflation is up, home foreclosures and bankruptcy filings are up, number of laid off workers due to domestic US factory closings in up, violence involving guns in the schools - what the heck is going down?  Well, the standard of living for most middle class Americans is one, and of course the value of the US national currency, the US Dollar yet another.  But hey, don't get angry with me, I am just telling you what the US governments very own statistics are reporting (albeit these little details tend to get omitted from the official news and political commentaries offered up for public consumption).    
.
.
IN INDIA, NEXT GREAT INDUSTRIAL STORY:
By Anand Giridharadas International Herald Tribune, Monday APRIL 17, 2006
.
Made in China may be getting a new rival.  As global manufacturers seek new places to plant their flags, India - where factories have long been conspicuous for their relative absence - is seeing early stirrings of an industrial renaissance. The effects could be profound for India's vast number of poor people, and for the international sourcing of goods from cars to bras.  Across India, total exports - mostly manufactured goods - are rising at a 26 percent annual clip, the Commerce Ministry reported recently. The manufacturing sector is growing at 9.4 percent annually, compared with 6 percent a year from 1991 to 2004, according to the Finance Ministry.  Special economic zones - the same enclaves of relative economic freedom that spearheaded China's export-led industrialization - are now spreading here, providing tax holidays, more control over infrastructure like water and power and less regulation. At least 75 zones are in the works, with more than a dozen already operating.
.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/04/16/yourmoney/make.php
.
.
CREATING THE JOBS OF THE FUTURE
By Steve Lohr The New York Times, Tuesday - April 18, 2006
.
On his Asian trip last month, President George W. Bush urged Americans to not fear the rise toward prosperity of emerging economies like India. Education, Bush said, was the best response to globalization, climbing further up the ladder of skills to fill the jobs of the 21st century.  But a ladder to where? That is, where are educated young Americans likely to find good jobs that will not be shipped off to India or China?
.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/04/17/business/services.php
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Where will the new jobs be in the new America??  Well, as we reported about this very same topic as projected by the US Governments own Bureau of Labor Statistics recently, the data indicates plenty of jobs will be in the new and improved service sector.  You know, your kids can probably find domestic employment as Ambulance Drivers, Nursing Home Attendants, Home Health Aides (the vast majority of jobs will be in the health care sector taking care of all those aging baby-boomers), law enforcement (they might need more cops to crack down on all those unruly illegal immigrants) and such related fields.  It is true that improved education leads to the opportunity for better paying professional jobs - if such jobs are available, that is.  Hey, I just thought of something.  They claim all the low paying service jobs in America are being done today by illegal foreigners (Mexicans mostly, but not all) because the native-born Americans (Anglos, Wasps, etc.) do not want to do such jobs (or at least not for the below minimum wage salaries being paid to do them).  By the way, this is not just an American problem.  According to a recent BBC news report covering economic and employment trends in the European Union, the BBC reporter states that because of Germanys very generous unemployment benefits, farmers in Germany hire Polish citizens to pick Asparagus on a German farm in Germany - for Germans.  In other words, why would native Germans do farm work when the government will pay you stay at home and do nothing (in terms of the generous social welfare benefits)?  Just as is the case with Mexican farm workers in the US, the Germans have to get Polish citizens to pick produce because native Germans will not do it.  This is the problem with socialism.  Such unemployment and social welfare benefits are not so generous in the US, but regardless it results in the same general issue.  Foreigners from less well off neighboring countries doing the manual, service or minimum wage kinds of jobs because the native born (US and wealthier Western European nations) will not.  In Darlington, England many of the taxi drivers are citizens from the Czech Republic and the owner of the taxi company says he is glad to have them (he claims he cannot find quality local British citizens willing to do this kind of work, you know, really gruesome work like driving a taxi cab).  However, one does wonder where all this will lead, as factory jobs go abroad and now higher skill level jobs (engineers, architects, scientific research) are also being moved to lower wage jurisdictions (such as India).
.
So, does this mean that native-born US citizens will start to come into conflict with the illegal immigrants for the shrinking pool of jobs left (assuming the vast majority of jobs remaining will indeed be in this very same so-called service sector)?  Will it mean that this pressure will keep labor rates low (maybe push them lower) as college educated chemical engineers compete with illegal Mexicans for nursing home jobs in the future?  Will the American middle class standard of living continue to go down as a result?  I do not know, but a worthwhile group of social-economic questions worth asking.  I guess we will have to wait and see how all this pans out, but from the looks of it, there will be some dramatic changes on the horizon. 
.
.
JURY FINDS EX-GOVENOR OF ILLINOIS GUILTY IN CORRUPTION CASE
By Monica Davey and John O'neil - The New York Times, April 18, 2006
.
George Ryan, the former governor of Illinois who drew international notice by emptying his state's death row, was convicted today of all charges brought against him in a sweeping federal corruption case.  After more than five months of sometimes complicated testimony in his federal case, and after five weeks of still more tangled deliberations, a jury convicted Mr. Ryan, a Republican, of granting state business to associates in exchange for cash and presents for himself, his family and his friends.
.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/04/18/america/web.0418gov.php
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Many people often tell us that they are afraid to relocate to a foreign country.  They say - John, you know there are many crooked and corrupt politicians in those Third World countries.  Yes Sir - sure are.
.
.
IRAN'S OIL BOURSE: A THREAT TO THE U.S. ECONOMY?
By Niusha Boghrati, Worldpress.org correspondent, April 11, 2006
.
While Iran's nuclear program has become a major focus of the international media, there are many who strongly believe that the program is only a cover for the U.S. government's true motive in a possible attack against Iran.  What some analysts posit is the real concern for the United States is Iran's plan to open its own oil exchange -- the Iranian Oil Bourse (IOB) -- with the alleged goal of becoming the dominant center of the Middle East's oil trade.  What makes the IOB the subject of such interest by the American government? According to rumors, which first vaulted the issue into the spotlight, the financial exchange in the aforementioned bourse will trade for oil in euros instead of the U.S. dollar. The dollar has long been the dominant currency for international oil trade.  The debate over the ultimate financial impact of trading oil in euros rather than dollars is a complex one, but according to some experts such a move could lead to a huge drop in value for the American currency, potentially putting the U.S. economy in its greatest crisis since the depression era of the 1930s.
.
http://worldpress.org/Mideast/2314.cfm
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Is it really the Nukes or is it the Euros?  The April 17, 2006 issue of Pravda (Russia) reports the following:  The price for Brent oil has reached a historic level, as for the first time it has risen above 70 dollars per barrel. If the USA does launch a military operation against Iran, experts think that the price for black gold could reach 100 dollars per barrel.
.
Source: http://english.pravda.ru/russia/economics/17-04-2006/79248-oil-01
.
The reason the US government really has a pet peeve about this Euro thing is, that it undermines US economic hegemony.  Meaning, what if all the oil producing nations suddenly said they want to get paid in Euros, or gold bullion, or anything other than US Dollars?  Well, it creates a real economic problem for the US to be sure.  This is so because it means paying for a much-needed commodity with something other than play-dough monopoly money (the Euro really is another fiat play-dough monopoly money too, albeit someone else's).  In any event, the point is, many nations and not just the US of course print monopoly money.  Little scraps of paper with fancy engravings of former dead national heroes on them, and voila - people think it is magically worth something.  So, foreigners accept these little fancy engraved papers in exchange for real goods or products, like oil, automobiles, computers, clothing, cell phones and so on.  But what if all of a sudden, they lost faith in those fancy scraps of paper?  What if the folks that produce the manufactured goods or had commodities to sell (such as oil, steel) wanted to get paid in gold, or someone else's money (that they thought was better)? 
.
It is interesting to note that the former ruler of Iraq switched over to pricing his oil in Euros shortly before his, shall we say, displacement.  Now of course the speculation exists that Iran is planning to do the same.  In the first case, we were told Iraq was a nation of really bad guys and we needed get those weapons of mass destruction.  Sound like a familiar story with Iran?  Once again the question is asked: Is it the oil, is it the threat of weapons or is it the threat of Euros?  Who said economics was boring?
.
.
DOLLAR DROPS MOST THIS MONTH BEFORE US CAPITAL FLOW REPORT
.
April 17 (Bloomberg) -- The dollar fell the most against the yen this month and had its biggest drop versus the euro in almost two weeks before a Treasury report today that may show foreign investors slowed purchases of U.S. assets in February.  The U.S. currency has declined about 3.4 percent this year versus the euro and .05 percent against the yen as investors anticipate that the Federal Reserve nearing the end of interest rates rate increases, while the European Central Bank will continue to boost lending costs.  The forecast for foreign purchases indicates that foreign net purchases of U.S. assets weren't enough to finance February's trade deficit, which was $65.7 billion. The U.S. needs to lure more than $2 billion a day to offset a record deficit in its current account, the broadest measure of trade.
.
http://www.bloomberg.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  The 3.4 percent devaluation is not really the big story here, as we must recall the US Dollar recently appreciated by about 14 percent against the Euro not too long ago (which we think to be a temporary anomaly to the long-term trend, and all markets tend to move erratically in this way also, oil just another example of up, down and then up again).  No, the real story here is the possible lack of interest by foreigners to buy US dollars or invest in US dollar denominated assets.  To repeat what we asked earlier - what if all those finicky foreigners no longer want to accept those pretty US Dollar Federal Reserve Notes?  Hmmm - what will happen then?
.
.
READERS WRITE IN:
.
Like many thousands of others, I have read your messages from DR for years. I never answered because I knew twenty others would answer in generally the same manner I would answer. This time is different though, because I am currently experiencing events outlined within your first advisory.  We moved to Colombia primarily for three reasons, one of which was an education for our sons that would NOT center around "dumb is better, and dumbest is the best" form of education that exists in my beautiful US. To that end, our decision is reaping rewards. One of our sons is already better in his Spanish class than most of the students born and raised in Colombia.  Our son is infinitely happier here with school than within the bully and belligerent atmospheres that exist within most American schools. And, the reason is simple. Within the US schools, if a student creates havoc, the administration is forced to remain silent for fear of litigation. The havoc producers understand that they are special, that they have been given tacit approval to act as they wish, and they do so knowing there will be little if any penalty.
.
The schools here though are quite different. All the students were born in Colombia. The parents of the students know that if Juan or Pedro misbehaves, the headmaster will simply exile their children forever. That is truly bad news because one of the major pieces of information that travels with a student from one school to another in Colombia is...attitude and behavior. After expulsion from as few as three private institutions, the only choice remaining for that particular child's education is public, and in Colombia, that is one step above a prison education. Their are no remedies in Colombia for an angry parent who is convinced his child has been identified as an outcast because his child is different in one manner or another.  So, generally the school atmosphere here is laced with a desire to create an excellence in education. When our sons complete their secondary education in Colombia - - not only will they be prodigiously bilingual, they will have a complete understanding of the South American culture, and they will have many South American contacts from which they can benefit once they have completed their university academics.  The cost of their education in the US for a similar facility and benefits would be approximately $40k per year. Here? It is approximately one tenth of that amount (than in the US).
.
Getting cash into Colombia can quickly become a minefield though. I have a belief that that is a result of the USG doing everything possible to control US citizens. I doubt the Colombian government would place many if any restrictions on amounts of capital brought into Colombia unless the USG ordered Colombia to do so.  Still, moving and remaining here is difficult for me. Dishonesty, corruption, and lack of honor abound, and it is tough to negotiate what would in the US be normal human communication. Here, if one shows respect and integrity, it is considered weakness. What is returned for being appropriately respectful and honest is dishonesty and a complete lack of respect. I am certain over time I will learn the system and become better equipped to maneuver through the differences.
.
EDITORS REPLY:  Thank you for your letter and you touch upon some very important points when considering life in another country.  Which is to say, there are always going to be pluses and minuses, positives and negatives.  Stated another way, some things will be much better and much more to your liking (the school system and better education your son is getting, not to mention the very much reduced and reasonable cost) and the flip side, disorganized bureaucracy or cultural differences at times.  I will not say I think other countries are necessarily more corrupt than the US, or perhaps better said, that foreign politicians any more corrupt.  I think the difference is, in many countries, the shenanigans are in your face, where as they are bit more, shall we say, covert and convoluted regarding how deals are done in the US (see news article above).  Politicians in the US give no-bid contracts to private corporations with who only knows what kind of under the table or deferred pay-off later on (which of course this is all legal, but ethics and legality are often miles apart in terms of politics).  This kind of nonsense goes on everywhere, it is the dark side of politics the world over regardless if you like to admit it or not.
.
In any event, the one social observation I have made over the years is that I think Americans have been lulled into a sense of pacifism or complacency.  In this regard, most Americans are not what they used to call - street smart.  Americans often place a great deal of trust upfront with business dealings, with the expectation the other party will complete the job (or whatever), and also knowing they have redress or recourse with the better business bureau if not through the courts.  Which is to say, the one redeeming quality in general about doing business in the US is a high level of service and recourse when the consumer has been wronged in some way (although there any many exceptions to this as well).  However, this has often been abused and the US is now a society consisting of a nanny state, whereby the government dictates everything from what you are allowed to say in public, or in the workplace especially, to what kind of locks you need to put on your yard gate.  In addition, there are more lawyers than alley cats, who spend all their time suing everyone, often for so-called injustices that would be thrown out of court anywhere else.  So, I suppose one can say there is a dark side to all this efficiency and consumer protection as well. 
.
But, what most Americans do not realize is that they have given up their freedom in the process.  Anytime you ask the government to regulate your affairs, manage your own money for you, redress your personal grievances, and generally speaking handle what probably should be private and personal matters, then while on the one hand you have a higher authority possibly preventing certain kinds of abuses (using the full force of the government to in theory crack down on any problems), on the other hand you have that very same authority with complete and unprecedented control over your life (with restrictions attached).  Let us use the example of saving for retirement as just one item.  Most Americans do not save for their own retirement.  Why not?  Simply because they are lulled into the belief government will take care of that for them via payroll deductions into the government run social security system.  However, what is the flip side?  The government tells you at what age you can retire, and how much money you will get in the form of a monthly check, and how much you have to pay in as well.  You have no choice.  You have given up the responsibility to take care of yourself, and have given that responsibility to some one else, namely a bureaucratic government agency.  But, you have also given up your own freedom in the process.  In other words, you have given up the freedom to handle your own affairs as you see fit simply because such a responsibility has been voluntarily turned over to the higher government authority.  What does this have to do with living in Columbia, or perhaps Latin America in general?  
.
Well, as I hinted at previously, I think Americans especially have some difficulties adjusting to differences in business culture and thinking elsewhere.  Again, some of the differences might be better, and some not as good.  In line with this, I have said time and time again, no country is perfect.  I often encourage clients to make a checklist of the ten or fifteen issues or things most important to them, and then find a country that score highest on that list.  Each one of such lists will be different for each person because all of us have personal items of importance than differ.  In any event, I do think the key is to understand the culture, and learn how to maneuver accordingly.  Which is say, some people have said to me, Oh - things do not work in such and such a country.  Well, it is not a case that certain processes do not work, but rather do not work in the way you are used to.  However, people in the society send their kids to school, go to work, get their driving licenses or building permits, and all the other things more or less common in terms of activities in any country.  You are not going to change a culture or society, so do not even try to fight it.  Instead, learn how the locals get things done and follow their lead.  You have two choices really.  Get upset, or learn how to get things done without getting ripped off or losing your sanity in the process.
.
I will give you a concrete example.  Most Americans when doing business would not find it uncommon to pay an upfront deposit (if not the entire purchase price) for services or products they are buying.  In turn, they have the expectation that everything will be delivered or done on time as promised.  However, it is often the case in Latin America, you pay someone upfront, and then they disappear.  In addition, also understand that in the services industry especially (plumbers, electricians, etc.) that a bit of haggling and stern negotiation is required.  Which is to say, you will most likely get the over-inflated gringo price from the start, or on the first go-round.  Stated more clearly, some poor electrician will come to your home, take a look around, and size you up based on what he think he can get out of you, and not necessarily offer some flat rate he offers someone else.  So, do not be rude, do not loose your temper, but rather simply be prepared to negotiate or deal with it.
.
It is not that everyone is a crook or dishonest, but this is how things are done, for better or worse.  It is a mindset, a learned game of besting the other guy, and it is really a sort of game which you need to learn how to play.  Also, most foreigners think the locals are always trying to rip them off.  I have news for you - - this is what they do with each other so it is not a form of discrimination against the foreigner.  However, you are going to be fighting a stereotype, which is, you are an American or European (ergo you are loaded).  On the other hand, Americans do have the reputation of being fair and more generous, so they will often prefer to do business with you rather than say an Italian (who have the reputation of being more tight fisted than even the Latinos, in terms of shelling out money).  In line with this, your comment about being considered to be a fool or idiot for doing certain things as you would in the US is accurate in one sense.  You think that you are being very fair, more generous and forthright than the locals (and that they should appreciate this even more), yet instead they view you as some idiot with more money than brains - Am I right?  Been there, done that and the following is what I have learned.                
.
There is a terminology in the Dominican Republic, which is Tigre (Tiger in Spanish).  If someone calls you a tigre, it could mean one of two things (one is sort of an insult or degrading comment whereas the other is sort of a complement).  Meaning, a tigre could mean a street hoodlum, common crook or general degenerate.  On the other hand, depending upon the circumstance or how someone uses the phrase, if you are called a tigre - it could mean you are savvy, street smart, a good businessman, that no one can pull the wool over your eyes (so to speak).  What do we know about the nature of tigres in the jungle?  Tigers tend to respect other tigers; chickens (and other sort of fowl) usually get eaten.  So, the answer is to learn how to be a tigre - not the street hoodlum or thieving kind, but rather the smart, good businessman kind.  By the way, this does not mean losing your temper, being rude, or acting like a jerk when you deal with people.  It simply means, understand how to play the game.  Many Dominicans often call me a tigre (plumbers, electricians, construction guys I may have doing some things for me, people selling me construction materials, etc.).  I tell them no you are wrong, I'm no tigre - I'm a lion - know what the difference is? They usually answer no, that they do not know.  I then go on to explain a male lion usually can kick the (blank) out of a male tiger any day of the week.  They end up laughing and we usually get along quite well after that, once we establish a basic understanding.  The final point is, learn where people are coming from (metaphorically speaking) and how they think - and deal with them accordingly.  You are not going to change them (and them you) so do not waste your time getting upset or losing patience. 
.
On your comments about children and education, I tend to think this is pretty much the case throughout Latin America and I see similarities in the Dominican Republic.  For example, children are taught to respect their parents and teachers and this is very true today, in the so-called modern, progressive 21st century.  I think in the US, everyone is so worried about respecting and protecting the so-called civil and social rights of all groups that the end result is no one has any rights any more, or in the least, special interest groups tend to enforce their agenda and will on the rest.  In any event, I myself prefer the social nature and culture of Latin America.  Columbia is said to be one of the main drug producing nations, yet I will guarantee you that you do not have drug problems in your son's school.  I will also say, without you even telling me or saying so, that there are NO cases or problems with guns or other weapons being brought to school by students either. 
.
American society on the other hand, has gone berserk and worst of all, the inmates are running the lunatic asylum with the backing of the warden.  Meaning, the government and courts are so worried about protecting the so-called rights of various people and groups that everyone is walking on eggshells.  Schoolteachers in the US cannot do their job, especially when they have students with disciplinary problems because the school is worried about being sued if they take any action.  God forbid they fail a student or hold a student back because of poor grades; the parents will lodge a discrimination lawsuit.  The US in terms of the society was a great country fifty years ago, but today it is a mess.  With some of its shortfalls and differences, I will take a Latin American country like the Dominican Republic (or Colombia) any day of the week over the US, in terms of a place to live and raise my kids.  Many of these countries may not be as wealthy (not yet, but they are working on it) and there may be things that frustrate you, but these people have their heads screwed on correctly.  Crooks do not get to watch cable television at the taxpayers expense; you are not violating the civil rights of a burglar when you shoot him if he enters your home, children behave in school (if they do not, dad will make sure they do), and personal responsibility coupled with ones reputation socially and in business is of the utmost importance (at least generally speaking, the courts and the society support this even though there may be some people who attempt to violate this code at times).   These are some of the ideas and attributes of Latino society, and I prefer them.     
.
The US is worried about foreigners or foreign powers somehow threatening their so-called way of life?  I have news for you - it is not going to be such persons or other governments that will be the problem going forward.  That is my assessment and opinion, for what its worth.  In addition, while I have great respect for people like Peter G. Peterson who wrote an excellent book titled: Running On Empty (a commentary about the current state of affairs in the US), I disagree with his solution.  Which is to say, he claims the answer is a grass roots movement and political action to change the course.  I don't believe it.  I don't believe that there is any interest or will on the part of most US citizens or the politicians for such changes.  That is of course simply my own opinion, and yours may differ.  However, these are just some of the reasons, I think, that people choose to live in another country or expatriate if you prefer that term.  The US politicians want to believe middle class people are leaving because of taxes.  Borrowing from a US political campaign sound bite from the recent past - it's not the taxes, stupid.  Although, lower taxes, lower cost of living, an economy not propped up on a very shaky house of cards (credit cards that is) AND lower costs to give your children an excellent private education (without the drugs and guns) never hurt either.
© Ascot Advisory Services 2006

Go Back To The Main Directory Section :
.