Offshore Banking - Offshore Services - Panama - Dominican Republic
Retirement Abroad - Residency - Second Passport

.
news headlines - news archives
.

Contact Us About Offshore Banking, Residency and Second Citizenship, Company Formation and Retirement Abroad Options . .

.
Use Our
Reply Form
.
Click Here
Return to The Main Directory Section:
.
Click Here

.


About The Author:
John Schroder of Ascot Advisory Services writes articles for a number of publications and e-zines regarding topics and issues of interest or concern to clients.  As an expatriate himself, John has lived abroad for many years, and assists clients with services related to the topics on this web site.
.
.

.h
Sign Up for The Monthly Newsletter:
News items, articles plus the popular Readers Write In Section
Our on-line newsletter bulletin now going on our eighth year!   Offering  our  clients and readers news items and headlines often not covered by the mainstream media, articles of interest regarding banking, economics, real estate, taxes, living or investing abroad, plus much more.  Finally, our very popular readers write in section, with answers to some of the questions many of our readers have - that no one else wants to answer truthfully, except us!
Want to See our Other Back Issues from 2002 - 2006?........Click Here
news

Visit The Main Newsletter Section & Read Past Issues On-Line:
Dominican Republic Real Estate, Residency Filing, Banking and Interest Rates.  Panama Residency and Retirement.  Naturalization and Dual Citizenship - Expatriate Issues.  Economics commentary, inflation, housing, stock markets and investing - Plus a Whole Lot More ! .
Our April 15, 2008 Newsletter Edition
.
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC REAL ESTATE:
.
Just as quick recap regarding properties in the greater metropolitan area of Santo Domingo, the following are currently on the market.  There are many, many more for even larger two to three thousand square foot luxury apartments or single family homes, but these are mentioned as a reference.
.
In the Evaristo Morales section, a new luxury building is offering one bedroom apartments (condominium ownership) starting at US$71,500.  Two and three bedroom apartments available as well for higher prices of course.
.
In Bella Vista, a new luxury building to be ready for occupancy in October 2009 is offering three bedroom apartments (each with it's own bath) starting at US$128,000.
.
In El Million, new three bedroom - two bath  1,400 square foot apartment, starting at US$128,000.  New construction ready for occupancy in July, 2008.
.
.
IN THE NEWS:
.
.
DEVELOPING WORLD COULD BEAT ECONOMIC CRISIS: IMF - April 4, 2008
.
Developing countries are well placed to weather the current economic crisis despite growth in the US coming to a virtual halt, according to a report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Thursday.  The IMF also said industrial nations with more developed mortgage and financial markets have been struck harder by a correction in housing prices than poorer countries, where fewer people have access to credit.  Growth in the US has come to a virtual standstill and Europe will also experience a downturn as a result of financial market turmoil and a tightening of credit markets, said Simon Johnson, the IMF's economic counsellor and director of the research department.  But poorer nations by contrast will see less of a spillover from the housing crisis into the wider economy, according to the analytical chapters of the IMF's twice-annual World Economic Outlook.  Developing countries have a strong basis for sustaining their growth through a rise in manufacturing exports and a surge in commodity prices that has fuelled the integration of the world's economies.
.
http://news.in.msn.com/business/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  So-called developing nations with commodities to export, and local banks in such countries that do not loan out the money so easily (by checking the credit worthiness of the borrower and demanding a hefty down payment first) will survive, and might even do well.  It is of course some other nations that are net importers of food, and worse if the country has their currency pegged to the USD, that is finding both rising prices and food shortages to be a problem.  No sub-prime mortgage problems of course in such countries, but certainly inflation and food costs are taking it's toll (see news items further down below).  However, we now hear that Canada, which is not generally considered to be a developing or third world nation, should come out of this mess unscathed too.  In fact, holding some Canadian Dollars may give you a five percent return for doing nothing, if the predictions about the exchange rates hold true.  Of course, as you make your way up to Canada to open your bank account in Toronto, you can wave hello to all the nice Canadian soldiers heading in the other direction (see news item further down). 
.
.
CANADA TO SKIRT U.S. RECESSION
By Julian Beltrame, The Canadian Press - April 14, 2008
.
Canada's in-demand commodities have given it a new measure of independence and enable it to sit out the U.S. recession, says an economic outlook from CIBC World Markets.  The report released Monday said America will slide into a recession in the first half of this year as a consequence of the worst housing slump since the Great Depression and tight money.  But while Canada is not immune to the shock, it will be able to ride out the recession even more impressively than it overcame the high-tech slump of 2001.  For Canada, the diminished importance of the American economy to global commodity demand has meant downside protection for its resource rents against a U.S. economic downturn.  The CIBC investment banking division predicts that Canada's economy will slow sharply from last year's 2.7 per cent advance to 1.6 per cent, but will rebound strongly to three per cent growth in 2009.  And it says the Canadian dollar, which closely tracks commodity prices, will stay strong and finish the year at about $1.05 US.
.
http://money.canoe.ca/News/Economy/2007/12/21/4736114-cp.html
.
.
US CREDIT RATING UNDER THREAT - By Aline Van Duyn - April 14, 2008
.
The US government's need to provide financial backing to the state-sponsored mortgage financiers that dominate the US housing market could pose a risk to the country's triple-A credit rating, Standard & Poor's, the credit rating agency, said on Monday.  In the event of a deep and prolonged US recession, S&P said the potential costs of propping up government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) like Fannie Mae (NYSE:FNM) and Freddie Mac, which have implicit government backing, could cost the US government up to 10 per cent of GDP.
.
http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Now there is something you do not hear everyday.  The Financial Times of London reports that the US Government could loose their AAA credit rating for its bonds (or so says Standard & Poors, a US based bond rating company).  Unbelievable, but then again so are some other things as well.
.
.
U.S. EXPATS FIGHT THEIR SOARING TAX BURDEN
By Brian Knowlton - April 1, 2008
.
Tami Overby, a 20-year-resident of Seoul, is as much the face of the United States abroad as anyone could be. She drives an American car, uses a Motorola phone, purchases American appliances, eats at McDonald's, drinks Diet Cokes - and even rides a Harley-Davidson motorcycle. She brags about all these things to her Korean friends.  She is also the president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea, the face of American business there - which makes it all the more surprising that her board of directors recently had a rather anguished discussion, as she describes it, about replacing her with a local hire.  The reason: a change in the American tax code two years ago that has raised considerably the tax burden facing many American expatriates - and which, in turn, often makes it more expensive for U.S. companies operating abroad to keep Americans on their payrolls.  A few Americans have even renounced their citizenship because of soaring tax bills.
.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/01/america/expats.php
.
EDITORS NOTES:  The article says that: a few Americans have even renounced their citizenship because of soaring tax bills.  I would not call 300,000 people per year renouncing citizenship just a few, but then again, perhaps it is all a matter of perspective.  On the other hand, as domestic US taxes continue to increase (where else is the money going to come from?), one can speculate that these numbers could be even higher going forward.
.
.
LEAVE AMERICA, PAY AN EXIT TAX?
By Mark Nestmann - March 20, 2008
.
While Republicans and Democrats in the U.S. Congress disagree on almost everything else, there's virtual unanimity on one issue: the need to punish anyone who wants to permanently disconnect from the U.S. tax system.  Citizens of every major nation, save the United States, can simply leave their own country for an extended period, and permanently end the requirement to pay income or capital gains taxes.  But U.S. citizens are subject to all U.S. federal taxes wherever they live, no longer how long ago they left the United States.  Even accidental U.S. citizens--e.g., people born in the United States to non-U.S. parents, but never again lived in the United States--are subject to these rules.  Non-U.S. citizens who have lived in the United States for at least eight of the 15 years are also subject to these rules.
.
The only way out for U.S. citizens who wish to legally free themselves from the oppressive U.S. tax system is to acquire a passport from another country, and subsequently, give up their U.S. citizenship and passport.  Yes, it's a radical step, but it's the only way to accomplish what a citizen of almost any other country can accomplish simply by an extended period of non-residence.
.
And that's not all.  If you actually have the gumption to give up your U.S. citizenship or long-term U.S. residence, the Tax Code has a zinger for you.  It applies if you have a net worth exceeding US$2 million or an average income tax liability exceeding US$136,000 for the five-year period before you expatriate.  Should you meet either of these tests, U.S. law imposes an alternative tax regime for a period of 10 years after expatriation.  Generally, expatriates covered by these regulations must pay income tax for the 10-year period at rates applicable to U.S. citizens.  However, because the rules apply mainly to U.S.-source income, it's relatively easy to avoid U.S. taxes for the 10 years after giving up U.S. citizenship.  Congress now wants to change that with an outrageous law that would impose the first-ever exit tax on former U.S. citizens or long-term residents.  Last year, both houses of Congress approved legislation that would require expatriates who are subject to the alternative tax regime to additionally pay a tax on all unrealized gains of their worldwide estate that exceed US$600,000.  The tax would be due within 90 days of expatriation.
.
http://nestmannblog.sovereignsociety.com/2008/03/leave-america-p.html
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Ralph Nader said it best in a recent news article posted on April 7, 2008 titled: Corporate America Gets a Bail-out Bonanza, whereby he writes:
.
Is there a larger, more exploited, defenseless group of undifferentiated Americans than the 133 million individual federal income taxpayers? Their dollars are used to subsidize organized corporate interests, giveaway taxpayer assets like minerals under the public lands, and bail out speculative, self-enriching corporations and their crooked bosses.  There is no penalty for failure -- whether on Wall Street or in Washington, D.C. for misusing or wasting the taxpayers' monies.  I asked a powerful Senator:  What are the discernable legal limits on the Federal Reserve's bailout authority and how much total risk can the Federal Reserve heap on the taxpayers?  Can they go to a trillion dollars?  He did not know.
.
http://www.alternet.org/workplace/81518/
.
While Ralph Nader is seemingly not a fan of expatriation as a solution, the reasons why someone would want to do so includes some of his very own criticisms.  Other reasons include loss of civil liberties, and possibly some even worse scenarios one would rather not think about.  Now they want to try and stick it to you with a new expatriation tax?  Good luck with that one guys, and may the force be with you.  Most people are not that stupid.  Many people indeed simply go on vacation, albeit permanently, after they have already gotten their money out before hand.  Which is why we could certainly speculate that currency controls might be the next thing to be pulled out of the proverbial bag of tricks (which is also why getting some cash up, up and away sometime very soon could not be a bad idea).  Regardless, it is much more palatable to watch all this unfold from a galaxy far, far away - Don't you think?
.
.
AMERICAN DREAM HIT BY DOLLAR'S DECLINE
By Richard Lapper in San Paulo - April 1 2008
.
Migrant workers are choosing to move to Europe, Australia or Canada instead of the US in order to protect the purchasing power of the money they send home to their families, according to one of the world's leading experts on remittances.  The shift is a result of sharp falls in the value of the US dollar against other international currencies, many of which have been boosted by the rise in commodity prices.
.
http://www.ft.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  It is not just the native born US citizens that are heading for the exit.  Now the Financial Times reports that even foreign born immigrants are preferring to move out of the US as well, in order to earn money in something other than the US Dollar.  Interesting stuff.  In any event, let us now take a look at what is going on in the UK, which seems to have some of the very same problems.
.
.
HOUSE PRICES WILL CRASH SOON: BANK CHIEFS WARN YOUR HOMES IS OVERVALUED BY 30 PER CENT.  By Sam Fleming and Becky Barrow - April 4, 2008
.
House prices are 30 per cent too high in the UK and could soon crash, the International Monetary Fund warned yesterday.  After a decade-long housing boom, it fears Britain is one of the most vulnerable countries in the world to suffer a devastating price collapse.  In a further blow, both the Bank of England and mortgage brokers warned that the mortgage meltdown is going to get even worse.  The number of mortgage deals available has collapsed 13 per cent since Monday and 70 per cent since last summer's credit crunch began.  David Hollingworth, a mortgage broker at London & Country, said: It has got to be one of the most rapidly changing and volatile weeks any of us can remember. The credit crunch has really got a grip on the mainstream mortgage market and there is nothing you can look to that shows the situation is going to improve in the near future.
.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/
.
.
MIDDLE CLASSES FORCED TO TAKE SECOND JOBS
By Lindsay McIntosh - April 4, 2008
.
Middle-Class families are being forced to take on second jobs as the credit crunch plays havoc with their budgets.  Households with an annual income of 30,000 Pounds or more are resorting to extreme measures to ease the financial strain, according to a new YouGov poll.  It comes amid a deepening credit crisis which threatens to cripple the housing market as lenders continue to withdraw mortgage products and raise rates.
.
http://news.scotsman.com/uk/
.
.
ARE AMERICA'S BANKS BEING NATIONALIZED BY THE FED?
By Julie Satow, Staff Reporter of the Sun - March 12, 2008
.
While investors rejoiced yesterday at the news the Federal Reserve would flood the market with $200 billion in liquidity, a throng of economists and market commentators is fretting that the Fed's latest approach will accelerate inflation and weaken its own balance sheet.  There is also a growing concern that the Fed's strategy of infusing the markets with liquidity is precariously similar to an equity investment, which could translate into the nationalization of America's banks.  What we are witnessing is an incremental, partial nationalization of the U.S. banking system, a Ph.D. candidate in finance at the University of Kentucky, Steven Randy Waldman, wrote in a Web log post that has generated much discussion on the Internet.  Northern Rock in the UK is peanuts compared to what the New York Fed is up to.
.
http://www2.nysun.com/article/72721
.
.
FED EYES NORDIC-STYLE NATIONALIZATION OF US BANKS
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, International Business Editor - April 1, 2008
.
The US Federal Reserve is examining the Nordic bank nationalizations of the 1990s as a possible interim solution to the US financial crisis.  The Fed has been criticized for its rescue of Bear Stearns, which critics say has degenerated into a taxpayer gift to rich bankers.  A senior official at one of the Scandinavian central banks told The Daily Telegraph that Fed strategists had stepped up contacts to learn how Norway, Sweden and Finland managed their traumatic crisis from 1991 to 1993, which brought the region's economy to its knees.  It is understood that Fed vice-chairman Don Kohn remains very concerned by the depth of the US crisis and is eyeing the Nordic approach for contingency options.  Scandinavia's bank rescue proved successful and is now a model for central bankers, unlike Japan's drawn-out response, where ailing banks were propped up in a half-public limbo for years.
.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  A British newspaper reports that the US Federal Reserve is thinking about nationalizing the US banking industry.  And here I was speculating that Hugo Chavez might be crazy enough to nationalize the banks in Venezuela.  Silly me.  Who needs to worry about a left wing socialist in South America when you have these guys right at home in Washington, D.C.?  Regardless, the fact that nationalization of the banks in the US is being discussed is proof enough that things are perhaps worse than what is being conveyed.  Some additional reading for you is the following article:
.
BAD LOANS LEAVE SMALL U.S. BANKS SHORT OF CAPITAL
.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/03/business/rtrdeal04.php
.
.
DOES THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAVE A PLAN B?
By Kathy Lien, Chief Strategist - March 31, 2008
.
The Federal Reserve has cut interest rates, bailed out a US bank for the very first time since the Depression and announced that they are willing to swap their safe US Treasuries for risky and dubious mortgage backed securities. Despite their efforts however, the US economy is still in trouble and liquidity in the money markets remain a problem, which leads everyone to wonder whether the Federal Reserve has a Plan B.
.
According to the UK Telegraph, the Federal Reserve is eyeing the Nordic Style Nationalization of US banks as a temporary solution to the US financial crisis. Between 1991 and 1993, Norway, Sweden and Finland nationalized several institutions and their efforts have been touted as one of the most successful central bank rescues in recent history. Nationalization will not be taken favorably by the currency market, especially when it hits the newswires. Remember when the Bank of England announced that they were nationalizing Northern Rock back in April? The British pound fell 300 pips in 3 days. With interest rates already at 2.25%, how much further could the Federal Reserve cut interest rates? The low point in the past decade has been 1 percent, but the continual rise in the price of consumer staples such as rice, will force the central bank to stop turning a blind eye to inflation. Short of printing money, the size of the Federal Reserves balance sheet will limit what they can do. Two weeks ago, the Fed committed to swapping 60% ($420 billion) of its $700 billion balance sheet of safe and secure US Treasuries for risky and dubious mortgage backed securities. These extreme measures indicate one of two things (or both), which is that desperation is forcing the Federal Reserve to become more creative or they are running out of options.
.
http://www.dailyfx.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Ms. Kathy Lien, the author of the above article, offers two possibilities (they are becoming creative out of desperation, or they are out of options, which I tend to think is saying the same thing).  However, I would like to offer two more possibilities derived from empirical outside analytical observation.  Here we go.
.
First, I have the tendency to believe these guys at the Fed are on drugs, LSD or Peyote would be my guess.  Probably put into the water cooler, I think.  How can I come to such a conclusion?  Well,  for the life of me, I cannot understand how an extremely well educated (we are talking ivy league here), moral, sensible, logical and patriotic person would willfully, purposely and deliberately destroy their own nations currency.  I mean, these guys are supposedly some of the brightest intellectuals in the entire country.  So much so, that we are lead to believe that even their supermarket shopping lists are works of genius.  And yet, they do what they have done (and it worries me what they may do next).  In addition, and in tandem, I also cannot understand why such persons would willingly run up the debt and bankrupt the country as well, not to mention, create run-away inflation and higher priced food as a result.  I cannot understand it.  It must be the drugs.  It has to be.  What other explanation could there be?  But there is more ancillary proof for this hypothesis.  Alan Greenspan, seemingly now a private citizen once again (and we would argue, no longer drinking from that spiked water cooler) has miraculously sobered up.  Ever since getting off the stuff, he now states the obvious (the US is in a recession) and it has even been reported that he recently advised the Saudi Government back in February to dump the US Dollar (it's going down, don't you know).  How could it be that this guy all of a sudden has lucidity and clarity of vision (and of speech I might add) ever since getting out of that place.  There is something in that water cooler inside the offices of the Federal Reserve I tell you, I am certain of it.  Of course, to be fair to all points of view, the second possibility is that the folks that are fans of some offbeat conspiracy theories could be correct as well (perhaps water cooler induced also).  Which is to say that some do believe evil space aliens have come down to Earth and are now running things, albeit with special suits to make them look human.  Not to dismiss everything as a crack-pot theory, some of those politicians and guys at the Fed do look a bit, you known, alien, if you think about it.  The bottom line is, I do not know for sure and your guess is as good as mine, but something is surely afoul whatever the correct explanation.  Regardless, despite what Amy Winehouse says, maybe they indeed should go into rehab.  What do you think? 
.
.
BANK BAILOUT IS A PATH TO NATIONALIZATION
By James Pethokoukis - March 21, 2008
.
The phrase through a mirror darkly keeps popping to mind as I think about where the housing/credit crisis and the government's response to it are taking us. We are entering uncharted territory. What seemed unthinkable a few months ago is not only possible today but maybe even probable.  The Fed's brokering and backing of the JPMorgan-Bear Stearns deal may be just the start. Think about it: Uncle Sam might well be on the verge of doing one or more of the following: 1) refinancing a couple million mortgages and requiring lenders to write down the value of loans; 2) buying via the Fed billions in mortgage-backed securities; 3) creating a new government entity to nationalize troubled institutions.  Big Government seems to be definitely back in the building. And if it isn't, I think it at least just pulled into the parking lot.  Intervention. Regulation. Nationalization. No such thing as a free lunch, folks. These are prices the private sector will pay for government help. History will judge whether the price was too high.
.
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/03/21/
.
.
COULD AN ECONOMIC LESSON FROM SWEDEN WORK IN THE U.S.?
By David J. Lynch, USA TODAY - April 1, 2008
.
As U.S. officials hunt for solutions to what many economists are calling the most serious financial crisis since the Depression, they might draw lessons from another painful and costly banking emergency.  In the early 1990s, a massive Swedish real estate bubble burst, littering the Nordic economy with broken finance companies, failing businesses and jobless workers. It was the first systemic banking crisis in an industrialized country since the 1930s and it saw the Swedish economy actually shrink for three straight years, something that hasn't happened in the United States since the rapid demobilization after World War II.  Sweden used taxpayer money and lots of it to rebuild its wounded banks. In Sweden's case, the solution ultimately ended up on the government's balance sheet.  The government ended up re-capitalizing the system, says economist David Rosenberg of Merrill Lynch.  There's a lesson here.  Sweden's successful crisis management may offer a road map for U.S. officials. But the Swedish cleanup wasn't cheap. It cost the public an estimated 6% of annual economic output; an equivalent bill for the U.S. today would be nearly $850 billion.
.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Everyone loves a free lunch.  Unfortunately, there is no such thing despite what politicians tell you.  Which is to say, Sweden's nationalization of the banking sector resulted in a direct reduction of annual economic output by 6 percent, or the Swedish economy took a hit for US$850 Billion Dollars in today's equivalent.  I ask you two simple questions:  Where is the money going to come from?  For an economy already in recession, is it really such a good idea to reduce economic activity even further by an additional six percent of GDP?  Standard & Poor's is now predicting a hit to the US economy of an estimated 10 percent, in terms of bailouts for the FNMA and related acronyms.  You should note that the US Federal Reserve only has US$700 Billion worth of US Treasury securities on its balance sheet, and some analysts are suggesting a US$1 Trillion fallout will be the magic number when all is said and done (even the IMF has recently publicly stated this number as well).  In other words, the Fed cannot bail out the entire economy even if it wanted to, in terms of non printing press options (even they do not have enough assets on deposit to do so before wiping out their own capital in the process).  Of course, they could always start printing more money, and wouldn't that be just wonderful?  Speaking of which, some analysts have newly calculated that the money supply has been expanding recently by anywhere from 17 to 20 percent (depending upon what statistics you look at, and which analysts are doing the calculations).  As such, it would seem that inflation on steroids is here to stay.  Somebody please find Paul Volker, and quick.   
.
.
WALL STREET BROKERAGES BORROWING $38.1 BILLION A DAY FROM FEDERAL RESERVE - By Jeanne Aversa, Associated Press - April 3, 2008
.
Big Wall Street investment companies are stepping up their borrowing a bit from the Federal Reserves unprecedented emergency lending program.  The Federal Reserve reports Thursday that those firms averaged $38.1 billion in daily borrowing over the past week from the new lending program. That compared with $32.9 billion in the previous week and $13.4 billion in the first week the lending facility opened.  The program, which began on March 17, is part of the Fed's effort to aid the financial system.  The Fed, for the first time, agreed to let big investment houses temporarily get emergency loans directly from the central bank. This mechanism, similar to one available for commercial banks for years, will continue for at least six months. It was the broadest use of the Fed's lending authority since the 1930s.
.
http://www.freep.com/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  In addition, it has been reported that US banks have also stepped up their borrowing from the Fed's discount window. Banks averaged $7 billion in daily borrowing for the week ending April 2. That compared with $550 million in average daily borrowing for the previous week.  Seven billion a day versus five hundred million.  Such numbers represent an increase of 1,200 percent in borrowing activity between the banks and the Fed in just one week.  We would ask, what the heck is going on at these US banks?  Are they really that insolvent?
.
Wachovia Bank, the fourth or fifth largest US bank (depending upon what criteria you use) recently announced they need to raise up to US$7 or US$8 Billion Dollars (again, depending upon the news story) in order to stay solvent after posting hefty losses.  After already setting aside almost US$3 Billion Dollars in the first quarter to reserve against credit losses, Wachovia is now saying they expect another US$6 Billion in write-offs going forward.  That comes out to just about US$10 Billion Dollars in total losses for just one bank.  Just one bank.  Citibank, after getting a cash infusion of US$8 Billion from a foreign government, is now seeking an additional US$15 Billion in capital to stay operationally solvent.  How many other US banks are out there in the same financial condition?  Do the math.    
.
.
FOOD STAMP USE TO REACH RECORD LEVEL
By Yves Smith - March 31, 2008
.
Belying the claim that (until recently) the economy was in good shape, the use of food stamps is rising and will hit an all time high this year. Admittedly, that is absolute numbers with underlying demographic growth. The percentage of people using this income supplement was highest in relative terms in 1994, when the parts of the country had not emerged from a recession. While we may also be in one that has yet to be officially recognized, things certainly aren't going to get better near term. This may an indicator that economic stress among consumers is markedly worse than is widely recognized.  From the New York Times:
.
Driven by a painful mix of layoffs and rising food and fuel prices, the number of Americans receiving food stamps is projected to reach 28 million in the coming year, the highest level since the aid program began in the 1960s.  Citing expected growth in unemployment, the Congressional Budget Office this month projected a continued increase in the monthly number of recipients in the next fiscal year, starting Oct. 1 to 28 million, up from 27.8 million in 2008, and 26.5 million in 2007.
.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/food-stamp-use-to-reach-record-level.html
.
EDITORS NOTES:  In Michigan, one out of eight citizens in that state are using food stamps (which translates into 12 percent of the population).  In New York, the figure is one out of ten, or 10 percent of the population.  In Rhode Island, the number of recipients climbed by 18 percent over the last two years, to more than 84,000 as of February, or about 8.4 percent of the population.  The number of new applicants for food stamps has increased by 10 percent in the last year in Arizona, Florida, Maryland, Nevada,  and North Dakota.  The bottom line is, if you do not think that state income, property and or sales taxes will be going up, you had better think again.  Someone has to pay for it, and you can be sure it will not be Wall Street or the banking industry, which has it own version of food stamps at the moment.
.
In an April 2, 2008 news article from the Boston Herald titled: Budget Forecast Bleak, Massachusetts State Treasurer Timothy Cahill is quoted as saying: The states, cities and towns better start saving, because they will need it to weather the states coming economic storm.  No matter how bad this year was, 2009 is going to be worse.  Methuen City Councilor Joseph Leone said he agrees with Cahill.  He is 100 percent right, he said.  The state used to be everyone's bailout, and that is going to stop.  Medford Mayor Michael McGlynn said it will be difficult for communities to save any money.  He said communities have been so hard hit by cuts in state aid in recent years, we have used all our resources to survive.  And when you are fighting for survival, you have no opportunity to save, he said.  The taxpayers are not happy, he added.  (Editor) The taxpayers are not happy, the man says.  You think?  Wait until the state sales taxes and property taxes go up, just wait.
.
.
USA 2008: THE GREAT DEPRESSION
By David Usborne in New York - April 1, 2008
.
Food stamps are the symbol of poverty in the US. In the era of the credit crunch, a record 28 million Americans are now relying on them to survive - a sure sign the world's richest country faces economic crisis.  We knew things were bad on Wall Street, but on Main Street it may be worse. Startling official statistics show that as a new economic recession stalks the United States, a record number of Americans will shortly be depending on food stamps just to feed themselves and their families.  Dismal projections by the Congressional Budget Office in Washington suggest that in the fiscal year starting in October, 28 million people in the US will be using government food stamps to buy essential groceries, the highest level since the food assistance program was introduced in the 1960s.
.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  It was recently reported that 80,000 US jobs were lost in March, but like most government statistics, we think the numbers are fudged, as a polite way to put it.  Analysts at the financial research firm Celent LLC reported recently that they expect the U.S. commercial banking industry to lose 200,000 of its two million jobs over the next 12 to 18 months.  Obviously these additional job cut estimates represent a 10 percent reduction across the board in all banking sectors, or better said, of the 2 million total jobs attributed to the banking industry alone.
.
IMF Chief Economist Simon Johnson said recently that the U.S. economy has slowed to a virtual standstill.  The IMF (International Monetary Fund) has characterized the U.S. financial crisis as the worst since the Great Depression.  Will the US need a financial bailout from the very same institution it helped create to fight economic problems in so-called poor, third world nations?  The ironic answer could be, perhaps.  Although, if past experience of the other foreign nations dealing with the IMF is any indicator, help like that you may not want (or with friends like these, who needs enemies?).  Interestingly enough, the IMF has recently announced they will sell 400 metric tons of gold?  Why?  Are they in need of some quick cash also?  Is the IMF broke too?
.
.
HUNGRY CROWDS SPELL TROUBLE FOR WORLD LEADERS
By Tansa Musa, Reuters News Service - April 1, 2008
.
Is it not said - A hungry man is an angry man? commented Simon Nkwenti, head of a teachers' union in Cameroon, after riots that killed dozens of people in the central African country.  It is a proverb world leaders might do well to bear in mind as their impoverished populations struggle with food costs driven ever higher by record oil prices, weather and speculators trading in local market places and on global futures exchanges.  Anger over high food and fuel costs has spawned a rash of violent unrest across the globe in the past six months.  From the deserts of Mauritania to steamy Mozambique on Africa's Indian Ocean coast, people have taken to the streets. There have been tortilla riots in Mexico, villagers have clashed with police in eastern India and hundreds of Muslims have marched for lower food prices in Indonesia.  Governments have introduced price controls and export caps or cut custom duties to appease the people who vote for them, but on streets across Africa, those voters want them to do more.
.
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L23502580.htm
.
EDITORS NOTES:  Henry Kissinger is credited with saying the following in 1970:  Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world.  He is also credited with the following:  Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries.  And last but not least, good old Henry is also quoted as saying:  Today Americans would be outraged if U. N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government (this last item supposedly quoted from the May 21, 1992 Bilderberg Conference in Evian, France).  What does it all mean, and who cares what Henry Kissinger says?  I do not have any definitive answer, other than to suggest it is something to ponder as you sit down for breakfast with your US$20 box of coco puffs.
.
A news article dated April 11, 2008 from the Times (London) offers the following:
.
The UN has given warning that surging prices of staple foods could trigger riots around the world. The alert follows a World Bank report that 33 countries face social unrest because of food and energy inflation. Violence has been reported in countries as far flung as Egypt, Uzbekistan and Haiti, and workers in Argentina have gone on strike. Countries including India have clamped down on rice exports, and the Philippines has threatened farmers found hoarding rice with life imprisonment. Jacques Diouf, the director-general of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, said:  We have seen riots around the world and there is a risk that these will spread because of rising prices in countries where 50 per cent to 60 per cent of incomes go on food. The problem is serious.  
.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/article3723601.ece
.
.
FORECLOSURES COME TO MCMANSION COUNTRY
By Andy Sullivan, Reuters News - April 7, 2008
.
Million-dollar fixer-upper for sale: five bedrooms, four baths, three-car garage, cavernous living room. Big holes above fireplace where flat-screen TV used to hang.  The U.S. housing crisis has come to McMansion country.  Just as the foreclosure crisis has hollowed out poorer neighborhoods, for sale signs are sprouting in upscale developments so new they don't show up on GPS navigation screens.  Poor people weren't the only ones who took out risky, high-interest loans during the housing boom. The sharp increase in housing costs -- and the desire to live in brand-new, spacious houses with modern features -- led many affluent buyers to take out loans they couldn't afford.
.
The crisis has hit especially hard here in Loudoun County, Virginia, where upscale developments have supplanted horse farms over the past fifteen years.  About an hour's drive from Washington, Loudoun is one of the nation's most affluent counties, with a median household income of $98,000, more than double the national figure.  The county has also ranked as one of the nation's fastest growing in recent years as developers built thousands of super-sized, amenity-laden houses to keep pace with the booming high-tech economy.  High-interest loans accounted for 16 percent of the total during the height of the mortgage boom in 2005, less than other outer-ring suburban counties in the region but more than neighboring counties closer to Washington.  Now the bill has come due. One out of every 69 households in the county was in foreclosure in the last three months of 2008, well above the national average of one filing for every 555 households, according to RealtyTrac.  At the end of 2007, 20 of the 25 houses for sale for more than $850,000 in Loudoun County appeared to be foreclosures, according to Tony Arko.
.
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  The American Bankruptcy Institute reports that bankruptcy filings by individuals have increased 27% nationwide in the first quarter of 2008.  Individuals bankruptcies nationwide rose 40% in 2007 compared to 2006.  According to Bloomberg: More than 90,000 bankruptcy filings were made in March of 2008 alone.
.
Realty-Trac, which is a California firm that analyzes real estate data, expects foreclosure filings to hit TWO MILLION nationwide this year (2008) in the US, or roughly one per 62 American households (there were 1.3 million homes in foreclosure in 2007).  These numbers are mind boggling.  Can you imagine?  Well over three million middle class people getting tossed out of their homes (if you combine the figures from 2007 with the projections for 2008), and Gus Faucher, director of macroeconomics for Moody's Economy.com, estimates that 9 million homeowners currently owe more on their home than it's worth.  Of course, the latest thing is that nobody knew what they were signing in terms of mortgage documents.  Don't these people bring their lawyers with them when they go to a house closing, or have the contract reviewed before they sign it?
.
In any event, we speculated before that there could be a whole lot of angry, homeless and broke former middle class folks out there, and in the case of the news article above, all within a one hour car ride from Washington D.C.  I wonder if this is the Calamity that Congresswoman Jane Harman (Democrat from California) had in mind when she sponsored that home grown domestic terrorism law thing-a-ma-jig she put together in late 2007.  Is Jane worried that a whole lot of newly homeless and extremely perturbed people will be hoofing it to Washington and perhaps showing up in Congress?  Is she worried that many of these folks might decide to download the anarchists cookbook on their palm pilot (or maybe re-runs of MacGyver from You-Tube)?  Perhaps it's a stretch of the imagination to make such a connection, but then again, maybe not.  Regardless, it is interesting that the US recently signed an agreement with Canada on February 14, 2008 in Texas (on Valentines Day no less, you have to love the irony) to use Canadian soldiers on US soil to address civil emergencies (read civil unrest, domestic disturbances, civil disobedience, or otherwise the possibility of some really angry people with nothing to loose, since they already lost their house, their car, etc.).  Now why do you suppose the US government would do a thing like that (sign an agreement to use foreign troops on US soil)?  Here is the news link should you wish to read it, and by the way, if you think this upsets some Americans, the Canadians haven't been this pissed since the time workers at the Molson brewery went on strike and the Canadians had to drink Budweiser for a week:
.
CANADA, U.S. AGREE TO SHARE TROOPS IN CIVIL EMERGENCIES
.
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=327869
.
.
SOME HOMES WORTH LESS THAN THEIR COPPER PIPES
By Jason Szep - April 1, 2008
.
Shards of broken glass outside the basement window of 31 Vine Street hint at the destruction inside the three-story home.  Thieves smashed the window to break in and then gutted the property for its copper pipes -- a crime that has spread across the United States as the economy slows and foreclosed homes stand empty and vulnerable.  They cut it here and then pulled it right out of the wall, real estate broker Marc Charney said, pointing to broken plaster near a wrecked baseboard heating system in the 2,774-sq-ft home in Brockton, Massachusetts, a working-class city of 94,304 people.
.
Similar stories are unfolding nationwide as a glut of home foreclosures coincides with record highs in the price of copper and other metals.  Real estate brokers and local authorities say once-proud homes coast-to-coast are being stripped for copper, aluminum, and brass by thieves. Much of it ends up with scrap metal traders who say nearly all copper gets shipped overseas, much of it to China and India
.
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/
.
EDITORS NOTES:  It has been estimated that the entire planet now only has a three day supply of copper.  China imported about 1.4 million metric tons of copper in 2007 which represents a 134% increase from the 600,000 tons it imported the year before. China now uses 25% of the world's copper. China is expected to consume 50 million tons of copper over the next ten years.  So, lets see what we have here.  Homes in Massachusetts (and across the US) are being gutted for copper, which in turn will then be sold to China.  Is this what they meant by the economic benefits of globalization and free trade?  Have Americans become so desperate that they are trashing homes for scrap metal to sell to the Chinese junk man?  It would seem so, and of course all those abandoned homes are easy pickings.  I never thought I would see the day, but then again, almost nothing surprises me anymore.  After all, we now have a man in America who appeared on national television to let us know that he is pregnant, so I guess the lesson learned is never say never.
© Ascot Advisory Services 2008

Go Back To The Main Directory Section :
.